Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v3.0

Source: Xieyang WANG
Date: Generated on 2022-11-27

Show Deleted

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01186
01186
山 46.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00343
𤲞
Oppose Unification
According to the pronunciation of ⿱山𤲞, it should be a variant of ⿰土𤲞.


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03506
03506
虫 142.3
9 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00223
Evidence
青岛市地名志 黄岛区分册
01792
01792
木 75.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00239
𰿖
Evidence
《汉字海》P1008,华语教学出版社
01810
01810
木 75.9
13 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00240
Evidence
甘肃省平凉市地名普查资料汇编
甘肃方言土语集
01811
01811
木 75.9
13 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00242
Evidence
For this case, it's reliable enough to encode because it a simplified form of a tranditional character. There is no need to provide a reliable evidence of place name.
01008
01008
女 38.13
16 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00244
Evidence
福建省地名全册
01109
01109
山 46.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00250
New evidence
湖北省郧县地名志,P4
01146
01146
山 46.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00251
Evidence
It may be a stable error. There are different versions of 1958/1964/1966/1971/1980 陕西省公路里程表, I will check some of them. And I suggest we keep it in main set for now.
02744
02744
石 112.5
10 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00258
UTC-03168
Evidence
浙江省龙游县地名志
02823
02823
石 112.9
14 · ㇑ (2)
GDM-00268
𬙔
Evidence
易县地名资料汇编
00901
00901
土 32.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00293
𤲞
New evidence
《江西地名》1996年第2期,江西省地名方言用字读音、含义及区域表,P37

04672
04672
魚' 195'.8
16 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00300
Evidence
福建省地名全册
01038
01038
宀 40.7
10 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00312
New evidence
It is included in 《八辅》

And the article doesn't say 赤崁 is written as 赤⿱宀坎 but 赤嵌. As to this article, the anthor just list all characters used as same meaning and then give statement about all of them .
What's more, it's used in Fujian Province too.
03404
03404
艸 140.12
16 · ㇑ (2)
GDM-00321
Evidence
It is just the ⿱茨⿰次次洞 as well as the ⿱次⿰次次洞.
03323
03323
艸 140.4
8 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00325
Evidence
宁波市鄞州区地名志
02161
02161
火 86.2
6 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00333
Evidence
In Andrew's opinion, does 《宋元以来俗字谱》seem reliable enough? I don't think the comment is reasonable. Besides, all other corresponding relationships in the evidence is clear and right.
For example,赣 and 㶥
01186
01186
山 46.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00343
𤲞
New evidence
江西省广昌县地名志,P226-227

According to the evidence, ⿱山畬 and ⿱山𤲞 has the meaning of 斜坡. They are congnate but have the different meaning of 畬.
In place names, 畬、畲 and 𤲞 can be used as each other. But there are not too many pairs.
As I know,
For radical 土, there are 𰊮(U+302AE), ⿰土畲 and ⿰土𤲞;
For radical 山, there are ⿰山畬、⿰山𤲞、⿱山畬(WS2017)、⿱山𤲞.
However, 𤲞 is also a variant of 番 which means ⿰土𤲞 can be a variant of 墦, ⿰山𤲞 can be a variant of 嶓.
Considering people will more likely to think 余 and ⿱人米 as different characters, I suggest we encode them seperately.
New evidence
http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=70922
I think here is a case that ⿰土𤲞 is a variant of a 墦 (坟):
04314
04314
雨 173.8
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00355
Evidence
1:50000 map.
02927
02927
竹 118.6
12 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00359
Evidence

The tone could vary in different dialect.
04587
04587
魚 195.7
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00222
New evidence
04814
04814
鳥' 196'.10
15 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00393
Evidence
not misprint, but variant
03359
03359
艸 140.8
12 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00791
𬮠
Evidence
中華大典醫藥衛生典
04661
04661
魚' 195'.2
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00806
New evidence

04685
04685
魚' 195'.17
25 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00807
New evidence
P236 of the same book.

If experts think this to be unclear, I'd like to buy a hard copy and take a picture myself.
02282
02282
爪 87.21
25 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-05859
Evidence
It is unclear that if the is a dot here.

01538
01538
手 64.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06125
丿
Evidence
The glyph on the right bottom seems to be the corruption of 乑(U+4E51),not 求.
01047
01047
宀 40.9
12 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06842
Unclear evidence
The glyph is not very clear. According to the context and the evidences, it is hard to decide whether the vertical stroke should be out of the bottom bar or be out of the upper bar. So I suggest we pending this character for further investigation.
02475
02475
玉 96.6
10 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06937
𬼉
Unclear evidence
According to the second evidence, the character is identical to 𤥖 (U+24956). So the character in the first evidence may be a one case error.
02724
02724
矛 110.27
32 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06996
&P15-01;
Unclear evidence
The two evidences show different glyph. More evidences needed to confirm the glyph.
03945
03945
車 159.9
16 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-08372
Unclear evidence
Since ⿺𠃊㐅 and ⿺𠃊人 can't be unified, more evidences are needed to confirm the glyph.
01715
01715
日 72.14
18 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08386
Unclear evidence
According to the second evidence, there seems to be a bar under the 艹. More evidences needed to confirm the glyph.
03841
03841
貝 154.18
25 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-10196
Unclear evidence
The evidence is unclear to decide the glyph is ⿰貝蹙 or ⿰貝⿱戚𤴓.
03001
03001
米 119.4
10 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20616
New evidence
粮票
00538
00538
口 30.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20694
New evidence
东明县地名志,1985年4月,P266
01328
01328
心 61.6
10 · ㇠ (5)
UTC-03171
New evidence
马晓娜.“?”(qiou)类网络新造字的特点及产生机制探析[J].汉字文化,2019,(第9期).