The evidence shows ⿱𦍌介 on the left, but I suppose that 养 is better.

I think that this is a glyph mismatch. If you look closely at the representative glyph that was provided, the vertical stroke of the upper-left component is the same (curved) stroke as the upper-left curved stroke of the lower-left component.

The component on the left is the simplified form of 養, which should look something like this:

The current design is correct.