⿱吂能？

The evidence provided by TAO comes from 戰國文字編 or its revision, page 283. According to the first glyph from 曾侯乙鍾, aka 集成00288.4 in 殷周金文集成 vol 1 page 356, the glyph might be 𬢙~羸. So the two characters might not be unified.

The new evidence provided by someone else. TCA do not accept the new evidence because the shape is different with which TCA submitted.

Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.

This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.