Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v6.0

Source: TAO Yang
Date: Generated on 2024-05-18

Show Deleted | Show comments from version: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03560
03560
虫 142.8.3
GKJ-00436
TS 14 · IDS
Oppose Unification
As #15445/#15452 mentioned, ⿰虫肴 and ⿰虫⿱又有 are surely the variants, both of them are stablly used in dictionaries, that means both of them are valuable in historical usage process. So we don't need to unify the 正字 to the variant form while the variant one has been encoded in the previous, and should encode them separatly.
02417
02417
犬 94.11.1
GKJ-00628
TS 15 · IDS
Oppose Unification
According to the additional evidences, this character should be viewed as a stable variant shape of 𤠼. There is no doubt for it to be encoded.
Although character analysis is required in coding work, overall, our task is not to provide textual research for linguists and only code for correct character shapes, but to provide code points for social character usage needs. If some glyphs have independent usage cases in the text or have value in distinguishing glyphs, they should be able to be encoded. Discussing these types of characters without reaching a consensus would waste a lot of meeting time in the past and future.
04862
04862
鹿 198.8.1
GKJ-00701
TE-3A4D
TS 19 · IDS 鹿
Oppose Unification
For component 竒/奇 are both exit in PRC standard, ⿰鹿竒 and ⿰鹿奇 should be encoded separately.
01343
01343
心 61.8.5
GKJ-00748
TS 11 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Stable enough glyph which been used frequently, doesn't need to be unified.
00150
00150
人 9.7.3
SAT-08559
TS 9 · IDS 𢌜
Oppose Unification
I still can't understand why did this one need to be unified while the attached evidences showed this is a stable variant form of 廷.
00100
00100
二 7.6.1
UTC-03211
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
It should not be unifiable with ⿱一百 which share the same pronunciation and interpretation in the future


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03670
03670
虫 142.23.2
GKJ-00355
TS 29 · IDS
Radical
Agree with Ken’s comment #15049.
Change Radical to 196.0 (鳥), SC=18, FS=2


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02417
02417
犬 94.11.1
GKJ-00628
TS 15 · IDS
Evidence

汉书补注 P4130



Details on this page.
New evidence

說文解字 清嘉慶九年(1804)陽湖孫星衍平津館校刻宋小字本

說文解字注箋 民國三年(1914)京師補刻清光緒二十年(甲午1894)番禹徐氏桂林刻本

正字通 清康熙九年(1670)序弘文書院木刻本

正字通 清康熙間芥子園刻本

通雅 清康熙五年(1666)姚文燮浮山此藏軒刻本

御定佩文韻府 清乾隆間寫摛藻堂四庫全書薈要本

黔游记

古經解彙函二十三種·说文解字 清同治十二年(1873)粵東書局刻本

粵雅堂叢書·續黔書 清道光光緒間(1821-1908)南海伍氏刻本

養素堂文集 清道光十五年(1835)束華書屋刻本

平津館叢書·說文解字 清光緒十一年(1885)吳縣朱氏槐廬家塾刻本
中国养生文献全书·第三卷·调疾饮食辨
04915
04915
鼠 208.6.1
GKJ-00665
TS 19 · IDS
New evidence

景定建康志 52巻 [宋]周應合撰 四庫全書本 卷四十六


蘇魏公集 73巻 [宋]蘇頌撰 四庫全書本 卷六

中華書局校勘信息表
04837
04837
鹿 198.4.4
GKJ-00683
TS 15 · IDS 鹿
New evidence
九史同姓名略
01955
01955
气 84.2.1
GKJ-00889
TS 6 · IDS
New evidence
隸書正譌 / [明]吳元滿撰 / 5卷 / 續修四庫全書/明萬曆刻本/下卷/頁碼:44
元韻譜 / [明]喬中和撰 / 61卷 / 續修四庫全書/清康熙梅墅石渠閣刻本/卷五十三/頁碼:1182
字林經策萃華 / [清]墨莊氏撰 / 10卷 / 四庫未收全書/清道光二十六年藝林山房刻本卷二/頁碼:85
清平山堂話本 / [明]洪楩輯 / 24卷 / 續修四庫全書/明嘉靖刻本三恠記/頁碼:60
03133
03133
缶 121.5.2
UK-20421
TS 11 · IDS
Misidentified glyph
北堂書鈔 161巻 [唐]虞世南撰 四庫全書本
緑蘿山莊詩文全集 61巻 [清]胡浚撰 清乾隆刻本
續垂棘編初集/二集/三集/ 53巻 [清]范鄗鼎輯 清康熙三十四年刻本
唐類函 204巻 [明]俞安期輯 明萬曆三十一年刻四十十六年重修本
乾隆高平縣志 28巻 [清]傅德宜修戴純纂 清乾隆三十九年刻本
雍正澤州府志 57巻 [清]朱樟修[清]田嘉穀纂 清雍正十三年刻本
00033
00033
丿 4.6.1
VN-F000F
TS 7 · IDS
Evidence
There is still only one piece of evidence with no actual usage to prove the variant has been used in practice. A single and indirect evidence in the dictionary cannot prove that the character's form is reasonable.
00036
00036
丿 4.11.5
VN-F0BE9
TS 12 · IDS 𠂊丿𰀁
Evidence
Dose this component only appeared once in Chu Nom literature?


Glyph Design & Normalization

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01955
01955
气 84.2.1
GKJ-00889
TS 6 · IDS
Glyph design
Change the glyph of G-source.
01826
01826
木 75.11.1
SAT-03869
TS 15 · IDS 𦰩
Glyph design

The leftfalling stroke should come out.
01042
01042
宀 40.8.5
SAT-07035
TS 11 · IDS
Glyph design

The middle part of it should be 毋.
00380
00380
十 24.11.4
T9-7C26
TS 13 · IDS
Glyph design
Dose the left component should be normalized to 丬?
00868
00868
土 32.10.5
TD-376E
TS 13 · IDS
Glyph design
The pronunciation (Reading: jiàn) which TCA provided support my opinion that this character is a mis-whiten shape of ⿰土建.
00997
00997
女 38.11.1
TD-7A64
TS 14 · IDS
Glyph design
According to the pronunciation (Reading: yán), the right component should be 研, why dose the owner of this name or TCA insist to use an irregular form for encoding.
00111
00111
二 7.13.5
V4-4066
TS 15 · IDS
Glyph design

What's the standard form of 淫 in Chu Nom?
00008
00008
人 9.7.3
VN-F1663
TS 9 · IDS
Glyph design

#4315


Other

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03659
03659
虫 142.16.2
GKJ-00424
TS 22 · IDS
Other
Withdraw.
03543
03543
虫 142.7.4
GKJ-00431
TS 13 · IDS
Other
Withdraw.
02435
02435
犬 94.13.1
GKJ-00580
TS 16 · IDS
Other
No more evidence, withdraw.
04924
04924
鼠 208.7.3
GKJ-00662
TS 20 · IDS
Other
Withdraw.
04843
04843
鹿 198.6.1
GKJ-00679
TS 17 · IDS 鹿
Other
Unify to ⿸鹿吾 GKJ-00707.
04730
04730
鳥 196.9.1
GKJ-00739
TS 20 · IDS
Other
Withdraw
03366
03366
艸 140.9.2
GKJ-00780
TS 13 · IDS 𣆀
Other
Withdraw
02495
02495
玉 96.10.2
GKJ-00981
TS 14 · IDS 𦐇
Other
Withdraw it.
00001
00001
一 1.0.0
SAT-05947
TS 1 · IDS
Other
The new evidences does not prove that this glyph is a standalone character with independent pronunciation and interpretation, rather than a disassembled stroke. So what is the necessity to encode it again?