Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #60 2023-03-23 (Thu) 10:53 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
IRG #57 2021-09-16 (Thu) 11:33 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Evidence accepted |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 00366, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, IRG 57." |
5.0 | For 00366, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 60." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
GKJ-00819 | ![]() |
group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
a) Source reference | GKJ-00819 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E2F7 |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 24.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 2 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 2 |
g) Total Stroke Count | 4 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿱十冂 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 江苏方言总汇、江西方言土语汇集 |
Review Comments
I suppose that if bare lists of vulgar form characters such as the evidence provided by Wang Xieyang are acceptable for encoding, then all the remaining unencoded second stage simplified characters listed in 《第二次汉字简化方案(草案)》 should be submitted for the next IRG Working Set.
By the way, the evidences from 《江西方言土语汇集》 "list" characters in the same way.