«
00396
00397
00398
»
00397
26.0 卩
SC=11, FS=3 TS=13

UTC-03191
Similar To: 厁 (U+5381)
U+5381U+5381
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v2.0
[ New ]
The evidence presented conflicts with the version of GB/T 12052-1989 provided by China (Mr Zhang Zhoucai) for the preparation of the original version of the URO (attached below).
This version clearly reflects the shape of the current U+5381厁, not the proposed ⿱斜㔾.
My understanding is that this block of GB/T 12052-1989 supports Korean language bibliographic data used in the National Library of China. We should be able to confirm the shape based on that data. Or, perhaps Korea can provide independent evidence supporting that shape. It is possible that there is a ⿱斜㔾 used in Korean, but the current evidence alone is not acceptable.
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
2021-12-13 22:08:32
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE (Response)
WS2021 v2.0
[ New ]
1. GK-6841 (or G1-7D47) and GK-6863 (or G1-7D69) were removed from U+58ED 壭 from U+5655 噕 respectively because they don't match the ones in GB 12052.
http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4008.pdf
https://unicode.org/wg2/docs/n4104.pdf (see Resolution M58.03)
This means that the form in the original GB 12052 is regarded as the final authority.

2. Actually, the virtual row 93 of GB 12345 is not always correct either. 0x7D3A is missing 罒, but 72-20 (0x6834) the original GB 12052 is not. And GK-6834 (or G1-7D3A) is mapped to U+56D5 囕, with 罒.
Jaemin CHUNG
Individual
2021-12-16 07:17:20
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v2.0
[ New ]
Citing http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4008.pdf is circular reasoning by referring to a possibly bad decision based on the same faulty evidence and cannot be accepted. We still need independent confirmation of the existence and form of this character.
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
2021-12-18 17:00:49
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v2.0
[ New ]
I would like to ask the experts in Korea to assess U+5381厁 versus #00397 (aka UTC-03191), specifically whether they refer to the same ideograph, and if so, which form is correct. The other form should therefore be treated as an error form. If they are to be treated as separate ideographs, additional evidence is necessary, and perhaps the experts in Korea can supply it.
Ken LUNDE
UTC
2022-02-27 14:23:18

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
UTC-03191
1.0

Raw Info
groupUTC
a) Source ReferenceUTC-03191
b) PUA Code PointU+F476
c) Kangxi Radical Code26
d) Stroke Count11
e) First Stroke3
g) Total Strokes13
i) IDS⿱斜㔾
j) Similar IdeographsU+5381 厁
k) References for Evidence ImagesGB/T 12052-1989 72-34