Date | Description |
---|
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 03259, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, 2023-06." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-20219 | 1.0 |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-20219 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | EC6D |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 130.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 12 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 2 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 16 |
i) IDS | ⿰月景 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《畿輔通志》(清同治刊本)卷273 folio 50 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-20219-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
This is the clearer evidence for the same source. I think the current glyph is OK.
▲ [嘉慶]成安縣志(清道光刊本)卷2 folio 8a
▲ [光緒]廣平府志(清光緒刊本)卷58 folio 41b
IMO the second evidence is clear enough.
▲ [嘉慶]成安縣志(清道光刊本)卷1 一行 folio 3a
▲ [嘉慶]成安縣志(清道光刊本)卷1 選舉 folio 3a (also 晧 printed as 𭾵)
Both of them are 例貢. If 陳其⿰月景, a 監生 according to the original evidence, is related to them, then ⿰月景 might be a misprint of 暻. But since we have two new evidences, better just encode it.
This character is also needed as the personal name character in ROK, which is included in one modern internal system in ROK as U+F00C4.