| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #61 2023-10-18 (Wed) 11:51 am -0400 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Withdrawn |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 6.0 | For 04017, change Status to Withdrawn |
| 6.0 | For 04017, add Discussion Record "Withdrawn, IRG 61." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GKJ-00693 |
| group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
| a) Source reference | GKJ-00693 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E1E0 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 163.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 11 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 4 |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 18 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰鹿邑 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 五音集字 |
Review Comments
And Shuowen Jiezi (Zhonghua Shuju 1963, p. 132) does indeed have an entry for U+287BB 𨞻, which is of course written as ⿰麃邑 in seal script.
So ⿰鹿邑 is a mistake for ⿰麃邑 which is the archaic form for U+287BB 𨞻. As all characters with rhs 阝 can be said to be written with 邑 in the Shuowen dictionary, I do not think that it is a good idea to separately encode any more variant forms of characters with 邑 for 阝. Therefore I suggest a new UCV for 阝~邑, and withdraw GKJ-00693.