«
00001
00002
00003
»
00002
1.0 一
丿
SC=2, FS=3, TS=2

UTC-03396
No change, IRG 63.
U+5344U+5344
U+535DU+535D
U+5EFEU+5EFE
U+6563U+6563
U+8279U+8279
U+21B1DU+21B1D
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Other
COMMENT
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
cf.

Eiso Chan, Request to discuss how to handle the Sanban Sign for Chinese folk music and local operas, IRG N2540
IRG Meeting #59 Recommendations and Action Items, Recommendation IRG M59.7: IRG has no objection to encode Sanban signs as a complete set of musical symbols under a symbol notation system, separate from CJK characters.

Eiso Chan, Updated proposal to encode the Sanban Sign for Chinese folk music and local operas, L2/22-207R
Recommendations to UTC #174 January 2023 on Script Proposals, ... Such usage would reflect likely past practice, which would have found appropriate glyphs in
existing CJK fonts for such usage in scoring.
Eiso Chan, Proposal to add one common character to mark the rhythm of Chinese traditional music to UAX #45, L2/23-214
CJK & Unihan Group Recommendations for UTC #177 Meeting, ... The ideograph, whose representative glyph is shown below, can therefore be considered as a candidate for inclusion in the UTC’s submission for the next IRG working set.
Kushim JIANG
China
2024-08-22 03:14:53 UTC
Data for Unihan
UNIHAN_DATA
WS2024 v1.0
kSpoofingVariant U+5344 卄

U+5344


kSpoofingVariant U+535D 卝

U+535D


kSpoofingVariant U+5EFE 廾

U+5EFE


kSpoofingVariant U+8279 艹

U+8279


kSpoofingVariant U+21B1D 𡬝

U+21B1D
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2024-09-01 19:40:14 UTC
Data for Unihan
SEMANTIC_VARIANT
WS2024 v1.0
U+6563 散

U+6563
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2024-09-01 19:41:08 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Neither piece of evidence shows the character has been used in running text. Given Evidence 25, I support the proposal in L2/22-207R to encode this character in the Musical Symbols block and withdraw it from the working set.
Per Henry’s feedback on IRGN2540, it would be advisable for Eiso to consider including an additional character for the non-abbreviated form 散 in the proposal document to WG2.
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
2024-09-21 22:19:42 UTC
Evidence
NEW_EVIDENCE
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
人名用生僻字注音字典,武汉市公安局口卡科,NO.2712
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-10-06 08:28:27 UTC
Data for Unihan
SEMANTIC_VARIANT
WS2024 v1.0
廿 (U+5EFF)
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-10-27 11:04:24 UTC
Data for Unihan
SEMANTIC_VARIANT
WS2024 v1.0
How are U+5EFF and the proposed new ideograph semantically related?
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2024-10-27 22:25:05 UTC
Data for Unihan
SEMANTIC_VARIANT
WS2024 v1.0
The suggested semantic variant in my comment #5695 was wrong because the glyph was not exactly the same.
The proposed character with the bar(一) in the middle but the variant of 廿 have a bar on the top. So they are non-cognate indeed.
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-10-28 02:51:00 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
It is my fault that I didn't notice the position of the bar is not the same. And I'd like to apologize for the mistake. The variant of 廿 will be submitted to IRG in the future and thank you for pointing that out.
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-10-28 02:54:50 UTC
Data for Unihan
UNIHAN_DATA
WS2024 v2.0
kStrange K:U+30B5
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2025-02-12 16:25:11 UTC
Attributes
ATTRIBUTES_SC
WS2024 v3.0
[ Unresolved ]
3
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2025-07-04 12:34:24 UTC
Attributes
ATTRIBUTES_FS
WS2024 v3.0
[ Unresolved ]
2
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
2025-07-04 12:34:37 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #63
2024-10-23 (Wed)
11:48 am +0900
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
no change.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 00002, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 63."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
UTC-03396
1.0

Raw Info
Character ReferenceUTC-03396
CodepointF543
Radical1
Stroke Count2
First Stroke3
Total Stroke2
IDS⿻十丿
VariantsU+5344, U+535D, U+5EFE, U+6563, U+8279, U+21B1D
PronunciationN/A
Total No. of Evidences27
NoteskSemanticVariant U+6563, kSpoofingVariant U+5344 U+535D U+5EFE U+8279 U+21B1D