| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 10:06 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | pending for evidence ( 浙江省地名库外字代码对照表》) |
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 2:05 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | keep it in m set. |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| KC-10051 |
| Character Reference | KC-10051 |
| Codepoint | E008 |
| Radical | R027.0 |
| Stroke Count | 4 |
| First Stroke | 1 |
| Total Stroke | 6 |
| IDS | ⿸厂尤 |
| Pronunciation | 우 |
| Normalization Ref. | N/A |
| Total No. of Evidences | 1 |
| Notes | N/A |
Review Comments
unify to 厐 (U+5390)?
[Mr. Ma Shijie provided the comments, but what he wrote is not clear enough. Eiso rewrites after studying.]
The submitted character related to one word 醇~ on the evidence, which should be the variant form of the word 淳龐, that means the local people are honest and warm-hearted or the local customs are simple and homely. This is a stable word.
U+5390 厐 is the variant of 龐 or 龎. The only barrier is that we don’t have the UCV or any rule to support the unification.
A variant or an error form of 疣.
In Chinese place name, it is used in 浙江省德清县~家埭. Now the place name is 庞家埭. The character was seen in two verisons of the map and was digitalizied. So it is kind of a stable error form (variant) of 庞.
I think it is OK to encode the character based on all these evidence. And I think that the difference between 尤 and 龙 is major in this character with simple structure. I.E. even if the character is cognate with 庞, they should not be unified.