Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #63 2024-10-22 (Tue) 5:07 pm +0900 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 01386, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 63." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UTC-03251 |
Character Reference | UTC-03251 |
Codepoint | F4B2 |
Radical | 58 |
Stroke Count | 0 |
First Stroke | 0 |
Total Stroke | 3 |
IDS | ⿻⿱𠃍一一 |
Variants | U+5F50, U+2B739 |
Pronunciation | N/A |
Total No. of Evidences | 5 |
Notes | Disunification of U+5F50 & U+2B739 |
Review Comments
Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.
u5F50 is analyzed as [彐(彑)], that is for snout, or the upper part of 彖.
u2B739 is analyzed as [彐(又)], that is for hand, or the lower part of 雪.
The evidence #1 support [彐(彑)] and [彐(又)]. ‘the snout, vulgar form [彐(彑)] ... and [彐(又)] is a different character’
The evidence #2 support [彐(又)]. ‘lower part of 彗 ...’
The evidence #3 support [彐(又)]. ‘variant of 又 (hand) ...’
The evidence #4 support [彐(彑)]. ‘variant of 彑 (snout) ...’
The evidence #5 support [彐(彑)] and [彐(又)]. ‘variant of 彑 (snout) ... used in 彗 ...’
So all the evidences are supporting [彐(彑)] and/or [彐(又)].
Note that, the upper part of 帚 becomes this shape, and we know [彐(帚)] is different from [彐(彑)] or [彐(又)].