«
02452
02453
02454
»
02453
96.0 玉
𦥯
SC=13, FS=3, TS=18

UK-30024
Not unified to WA2021-02524, non-cognate, IRG 65.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Other
COMMENT
WS2024 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
[The following comment is raised by Mr. Ma Shijie.]

Similar to WS2021-02524:TE-2753
[WS2021-02524]
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2025-09-02 09:19:17 UTC
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2024 v3.0
[ Resolved ]

Unify to WS2021-02524:TE-2753 via UCV #252

As Andrew’s comment under WS2021-02524 (#14133), these two should be unified and the discussion record showed “China may propose horizontal extension noted, IRG 62”.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2025-09-02 09:21:35 UTC
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2024 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
Pronunciation of WS2021-02524 seems to be the ‌dialectal‌ pronunciation of 王 or 璺. Meanwhile, this proposed character prounuciates yu4 or wen4(璺). So WS2021-02524 and the proposed one are actually non cognate.
Xieyang WANG
China
2025-09-23 05:27:11 UTC
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2024 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
There is sufficient evidence now to suggest that they non-cognate and so should not be unified.
John Knightley
UK
2025-10-10 04:01:22 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #65
2025-10-14 (Tue)
2:13 pm +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Not unified to WS2021-02524, non cognate.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
4.0
For 02453, add Discussion Record "Not unified to WA2021-02524, non-cognate, IRG 65."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
UK-30024
1.0

Raw Info
Character ReferenceUK-30024
CodepointEFE3
Radical96
Stroke Count13
First Stroke3
Total Stroke18
IDS⿱𦥯玉
VariantsN/A
PronunciationN/A
Normalization Ref.N/A
Total No. of Evidences3
NotesN/A
2nd RadicalN/A
2nd Stroke CountN/A
2nd First StrokeN/A