The glyph is clear, but is there any source preceding the book? One modern printing evidence is felt uncertain, given how 南明 personal name spellings have been unreliable.

（明）洪楩 辑：清平山堂话本校注，北京：中华书局，2012年2月，第41页

The new evidence provided in #14384 shows that 「𣟴」was originally written as 「⿰木⿸户衣」in 《清平山堂話本・簡帖和尚》 . However, this claim is not true because 《清平山堂話本・簡帖和尚》 gives 𢲙:


▲ 《清平山堂刊小說十五種》（明嘉靖刊本）卷1 folio 6a

This shape is also observed by the GHZ:


▲ 漢語大字典 pp. 2052

So the ⿰木⿸户衣 provided in the new evidence is a modern error of 𢲙, since a proofreading record should have faithfully reproduced the exact shape in the original evidence.