«
03244
03245
03246
»
03245
140.0 艸
SC=4, FS=1, TS=8

GXM-00458
Not unified to 𦬟 U+26B1F, further discussion on UCV rule #404 needed, IRG 64.
Not unified to 𦬟 U+26B1F, UCV rule #404 to be changed to NUCV, IRG 63.

Exact Match: 𦬟 (U+26B1F)

U+26B1FU+26B1F
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Other
OTHER
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Seems not exact match.
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-08-20 12:43:16 UTC
Unification
UCV
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
UCV #404 unifies 艸 and 艹, but I am not sure it is a helpful UCV.
Andrew WEST
UK
2024-08-20 13:13:50 UTC
Unification
UCV
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
⿱艸⿰氵畨 (A03585-002) = 藩 (A03585)
⿱艸⿵戊𮍌 (A03579-007) = 藏 (A03579)
⿱艸⿸厂⿱示一 (C11600-001) = 𦱯 (C11600)
⿱艸馬 (A03027-005) = 䔍 (A03027-001)
⿱艸⿻丨⿱𠈌二 (A03503-009) = 華 (A03503)
⿱艸㇯𦮙艹 (A03522-007) = 𦮙 (A03522-003)
⿱艸㙯 (A03586-007) = 藝 (A03586)
⿱艸㝛 (A03560-004) = 𰱵 (A03560-003)
⿱艸㠩 (漢字海) = 𮎰
⿱艸䦨 (A03600-003) = 蘭 (A03600)
⿱艸丁 (B03777-001) = 艼 (B03777)
⿱艸不 (B03797-002) = 芣 (B03797)
⿱艸丏 (漢字海) = ⿱艸丐 (C11408) = 𦬛 (C11408)
⿱艸之 (A03433-005) = 芝 (A03433)
⿱艸交 (B03834-003) = 茭 (B03834)
⿱艸介 (A03441-003) = 芥 (A03441)
⿱艸付 (A02994-003) = 苻 (A02994-001)
⿱艸侖 (B03925-001) = 菕 (B03925)
⿱艸倉 (漢字海) = 蒼
⿱艸⿰氵𠝣 (漢字海) = 𧁄
⿱艸⿰豕生 (漢字海) = 蕤
⿱艸⿰㚔匊 (漢字海) = 𧂲
⿱艸⿰長隶 (漢字海) = 𧀳
⿱艸㓹 (漢字海) = 𦺶
Kushim JIANG
China
2024-08-21 03:29:28 UTC
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Suggest not to unify because it is a surname.
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-08-24 03:29:31 UTC
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2024 v2.0
[ Resolved ]
That this should not be unified has already been agreed at IRG #63 but still shows up because comments #519 and #836 have not been marked as resolved. (FYI this comment will also be resolved)
John Knightley
Individual
2025-03-15 07:42:41 UTC
Unification
UCV
WS2024 v2.0
[ Unresolved ]
Based on comment #519 from Kushim, I suggest the UCV to be kept and not changed to NUCV.

艸 at the top instead of 艹 as a strict transliteration form is commonly found in many dictionaries as a more "canonical" shape, but they are nearly universally variants.

In IRG past decisions, if a more common form is desired, the glyph shape is simply modified in place instead of encoding the form at another code point. They are variants without a doubt. The argument that both forms are preferred in different contexts, so they should be separately coded, is not a valid reason for disunification. The IVD exists exactly for this use case.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2025-03-16 18:35:58 UTC
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2024 v2.0
[ Unresolved ]
U+26B1F
Not unified to 𦬟 (U+26B1F).

In the meeting it was suggested by Andrew West to do an ad-hoc disunification for this character.

In that case, UCV #404 can be kept as a UCV.

I agree with his suggestion on the basis that we only do ad-hoc disunifications involving characters which are present in the Kangxi Dictionary, as there are only a limited amount of characters in the Kangxi Dictionary with 艸 at the top instead of 艹, and the majority of them already have encoded counterparts.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2025-03-18 03:06:05 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #64
2025-03-18 (Tue)
10:52 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
not unified to 𦬟 (U+26B1F). discussion on ucv/nucv 404 needed.
IRG #63
2024-10-22 (Tue)
9:51 am +0900
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
ucv 404 back to nucv. not unified U+26B1F.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 03245, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𦬟 U+26B1F, UCV rule #404 to be changed to NUCV, IRG 63."
3.0
For 03245, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𦬟 U+26B1F, further discussion on UCV rule #404 needed, IRG 64."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
GXM-00458
1.0

Raw Info
Character ReferenceGXM-00458
CodepointE1DB
Radical140.4
Stroke Count4
First Stroke1
Total Stroke8
IDS⿱艹亓
VariantsN/A
Pronunciationqi2
Total No. of Evidences2
NotesN/A
Secondary RadicalN/A
Secondary Stroke CountN/A
Secondary First StrokeN/A