SAT-06060 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #58 2022-03-15 (Tue) 10:21 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | postponed, SAT to supply statistics, ,TS=18, SC=15. |
IRG #57 2021-09-14 (Tue) 11:25 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𢤳 U+22933 |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 01239, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𢤳 U+22933, IRG 57." |
3.0 | For 01239, change Status to Postponed |
3.0 | For 01239, add Discussion Record "Postponed, SAT to supply statistics on the use of 巾 instead of 忄, SC=15, TS=18, IRG 58." |
3.0 | For 01239, change Stroke Count to 15 |
3.0 | For 01239, change Total Stroke Count to 18 |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
SAT-06060 | 1.0 |
group | SAT |
a) Source reference | SAT-06060 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | F16F |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 050.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 16 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 3 |
g) Total Stroke Sount | 19 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰巾䝿 |
j) Similar/ Variants | Similar: 𢤳/ |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-06060-01.jpg;SAT-06060-02.jpg |
l) Optional info | N/A |
m1)Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
unify to 𢤳 (U+22933)
UCV #173, and the evidence has showed it's the variant of U+6192 憒
The character on the same page is surely 𢤳 (U+22933), so SAT-06060 must be a wrong handwriting glyph.