9:01 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
|Not unified to 𢋐 U+222D0, ucv study needed.|
For 01265, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𢋐 U+222D0, further study for new UCV rule needed, IRG 58."
|a) Source reference||T9-7B39|
|b) PUA Code of TTF||E3C6|
|c) KangXi Radical Code||53.0|
|e) Stroke Count||11|
|f) First Stroke||4|
|g) Total stroke count||14|
|j) Similar/ Variants||U+222D0|
|k) Ref. to Evidence doc||IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_01|
|k1) Page No.||Page8, no.236|
|l) Optional info||N/A|
Unify to 𢋐 (U+222D0). U+222D0 has the pronunciation jí according to CNS 11643, therefore might be miswriting of U+222D0.
Based on the shape, there is no UCV rule to judge unification.
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?