«
01264
01265
01266
»
01265
53.0 广
广
SC=11, FS=4 TS=14

T9-7B39
Not unified to 𢋐 U+222D0, further study for new UCV rule needed, IRG 58.
Similar To: 𢋐 (U+222D0)
U+222D0U+222D0
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2021 v2.0
[ Resolved ]
U+222D0
Unify to 𢋐 (U+222D0). U+222D0 has the pronunciation jí according to CNS 11643, therefore might be miswriting of U+222D0.
LI Yuan
SAT
2022-01-19 03:25:38
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2021 v2.0
[ Resolved ]
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
Based on the shape, there is no UCV rule to judge unification.
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2022-03-15 09:39:44
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ New ]
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
Ken LUNDE
UTC
2022-06-20 13:07:55

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #58
2022-03-16 (Wed)
9:01 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Not unified to 𢋐 U+222D0, ucv study needed.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
3.0
For 01265, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𢋐 U+222D0, further study for new UCV rule needed, IRG 58."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
T9-7B39
1.0

Raw Info
groupTCA
a) Source referenceT9-7B39
b) PUA Code of TTFE3C6
c) KangXi Radical Code53.0
e) Stroke Count11
f) First Stroke4
g) Total stroke count14
i) IDS⿸广⿱火貝
j) Similar/ VariantsU+222D0
k) Ref. to Evidence docIRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_01
k1) Page No.Page8, no.236
l) Optional infoN/A