![]() TE-2562 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #59 2022-10-20 (Thu) 10:52 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | add second Radical to 130.0 (肉) |
Version | Description |
---|---|
4.0 | For 01392, change Radical (Secondary) to 130.0 (肉) |
4.0 | For 01392, change Stroke Count (Secondary) to 13 |
4.0 | For 01392, change First Stroke (Secondary) to 4 |
4.0 | For 01392, add Discussion Record "R(2)=130.0 (肉), SC(2)=13, FS(2)=4, IRG 59." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
TE-2562 | ![]() |
group | TCA |
a) Source reference | TE-2562 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E0BF |
c) KangXi Radical Code | 61.0 |
e) Stroke Count | 13 |
f) First Stroke | 4 |
g) Total stroke count | 17 |
i) IDS | ⿰育思 |
j) Similar/ Variants | No |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_01 |
k1) Page No. | Page10, no.298 |
l) Optional info | sī |
Review Comments
The pronunciation is sī provided by TCA, so the semantic element should be 育.
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?