![]() GKJ-00526 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #59 2022-10-20 (Thu) 10:05 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | pending for second radical 69.0 斤 |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 04187, change IDS to ⿰鏁斤 |
2.0 | For 04187, add Discussion Record "IDS=⿰鏁斤, 2021-10." |
4.0 | For 04187, add Discussion Record "Pending second radical 69.0 (斤), IRG 59." |
4.0 | For 04187, change Status to Postponed |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
GKJ-00526 | ![]() |
group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
a) Source reference | GKJ-00526 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E139 |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 167.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 15 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 5 |
g) Total Stroke Count | 23 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿲金巢斤 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 十萬卷樓叢書 |
Review Comments
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(十萬卷樓叢書本,第60冊)卷6 folio 20
and another new evidence:
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(清十萬卷樓叢書本,第60冊)卷6 folio 26
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(清十萬卷樓叢書本,第59冊)卷2 folio 19
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(清十萬卷樓叢書本,第59冊)卷3 folio 2
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(清十萬卷樓叢書本,第59冊)卷4 folio 5
From the preface 重雕宋本衛生家寶產科備要叙 of this book and the paiji (牌記) at the end, we know that the 清十萬卷樓叢書本 version is a reprint of the 淳熙十一年(1184) version.
The 淳熙 version consistently gives ⿲金⿱甾廾斤:
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本)卷2 folio 19 // 中華再造善本
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本)卷3 folio 2 // 中華再造善本
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本)卷4 folio 5 // 中華再造善本
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本)卷6 folio 16 // 中華再造善本
▲ 衛生家寶產科備要(宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本)卷6 folio 22 // 中華再造善本
I suspect ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 is a variant of 𨰉. Because of that, ⿰鏁斤 should have first radical 金. The second radical is fine for me. The evidences above also reveal that ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 is the intermediate form between 𨰉 and ⿰鏁斤.
Now that we have more evidences of ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 than ⿰鏁斤. Should we encode them separately? Especially both ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 and ⿰鏁斤 appear in the 十萬卷樓叢書 version. Alternatively, we can unify ⿰鏁斤 to ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 or vice, or we can unify both to 𨰉.
▲ 江南通志(清乾隆刊本)卷97 folio 6a