⿰鏁斤

Should it belong to 69.0 斤 or 167.0 金?

Here is the full evidence and the complete source:


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（十萬卷樓叢書本，第60冊）卷6 folio 20

and another new evidence:


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（清十萬卷樓叢書本，第60冊）卷6 folio 26

Here is the evidences of ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 from the same book, a variant of ⿰鏁斤 (See below for rationale).


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（清十萬卷樓叢書本，第59冊）卷2 folio 19


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（清十萬卷樓叢書本，第59冊）卷3 folio 2


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（清十萬卷樓叢書本，第59冊）卷4 folio 5

From the preface 重雕宋本衛生家寶產科備要叙 of this book and the paiji (牌記) at the end, we know that the 清十萬卷樓叢書本 version is a reprint of the 淳熙十一年（1184） version.

The 淳熙 version consistently gives ⿲金⿱甾廾斤:


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本）卷2 folio 19 // 中華再造善本


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本）卷3 folio 2 // 中華再造善本


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本）卷4 folio 5 // 中華再造善本


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本）卷6 folio 16 // 中華再造善本


▲ 衛生家寶產科備要（宋淳熙十一年南康郡齋刻本）卷6 folio 22 // 中華再造善本

I suspect ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 is a variant of 𨰉. Because of that, ⿰鏁斤 should have first radical 金. The second radical is fine for me. The evidences above also reveal that ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 is the intermediate form between 𨰉 and ⿰鏁斤.

Now that we have more evidences of ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 than ⿰鏁斤. Should we encode them separately? Especially both ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 and ⿰鏁斤 appear in the 十萬卷樓叢書 version. Alternatively, we can unify ⿰鏁斤 to ⿲金⿱甾廾斤 or vice, or we can unify both to 𨰉.

For reference, here is an evidence of ⿰釒剿, which is likely a variant of 䥷 / ⿰鏁斤.


▲ 江南通志（清乾隆刊本）卷97 folio 6a