UK-20216 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #60 2023-03-21 (Tue) 11:08 am +0800 Recorded by Henry CHAN | Postponed for further investigation (automatically processed by ORT manager) |
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 04264, change Status to Postponed |
5.0 | For 04264, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further investigation, IRG 60." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-20216 | 1.0 |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-20216 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | EC68 |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 170.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 8 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 4 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 11 |
i) IDS | ⿰阝府 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《增修登州府志》(清光緒刊本)卷47 folio 11 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-20216-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 續登州府志(清乾隆刊本)卷10 folio 3a gives 𨹘.
▲ 福山縣志(清乾隆刊本)卷10 folio 66a gives 𨹘.
From the evidences above, we know that both 王⿰阝府 and 王𨹘
1) come from 登州, were active in early Qing
2) have a son named 王𣻜
3) are titled as 通議大夫
So 王⿰阝府 and 王𨹘 must be the same person and ⿰阝府 is not attested in earlier gazetteers. Therefore ⿰阝府 is a corrupted form of 𨹘 and consider pending more evidences.