Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #60 2023-03-21 (Tue) 10:55 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Evidence accepted |
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 04263, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, IRG 60." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-20097 | ![]() |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-20097 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | EBF0 |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 170.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 8 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 4 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 11 |
i) IDS | ⿰阝京 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《紹興府志》(清乾隆刊本)卷4 folio 15 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-20097-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
On the other hand, a different edition of 《紹興府志》 has ⿰阝京:
Additional evidence would be useful.
▲ [寶慶]會稽續志(明正德刊本)卷4 folio 2a
▲ 諸暨縣志(清乾隆刊本)卷3 folio 15a
The [嘉泰]會稽志 mentions that 《五洩山十題》is included in 《掇英》:
▲ [寶慶]會稽續志(明正德刊本)卷4 folio 2a
《掇英》 should be short for 《會稽掇英總集》, here it gives 源:
▲ 會稽掇英總集(明山陰祁氏淡生堂鈔本)卷4
The baidu 百科 mentions that there is 西源峽谷 in 五洩. And the poem 造化鑿坤維,千巖闕空碧。有時雲雨開,殘陽落幽石 also depicts a valley scene.
Therefore, ⿰阝京 is very likely a misprint of 源. Here 氵 and 丿 combine into 阝 and 京 might be a corrupted form of 亰 (a variant of 原 without 丿). But given that we have multiple ⿰阝京 evidences, I suggest we encode it as-is.
This character is also needed as the personal name character in ROK, which is included in one modern internal system in ROK as U+F1943.