Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #62 2024-03-21 (Thu) 9:41 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
TE-244F | 1.0 |
group | TCA |
a) Source reference | TE-244F |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E15D |
c) KangXi Radical Code | 85.0 |
e) Stroke Count | 14 |
f) First Stroke | 3 |
g) Total stroke count | 17 |
i) IDS | ⿰氵夐 |
j) Similar/ Variants | U+2DCA6 |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_01 |
k1) Page No. | Page6, no.158 |
l) Optional info | qióng |
Review Comments
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?
In WS2017 review, I once mentioned WS2017-02193 could be unified with U+2DCA6 𭲦.
In the KC DB, there are three source reference related to this character.
KC-02163 ⿰氵⿳爫旧夂
KC-05266 ⿰氵⿱𦥝夂
KC-07515 ⿰氵夐
If we unify this character to U+2DCA6 𭲦, ROK should change the glyph to ⿰氵夐 and the source reference to KC-07515.
If we encode this character separately, ROK should change the source reference for U+2DCA6 𭲦 to KC-02163 and do the horizontal extension for this character as KC-07515 in future.
Current KC-05266 glyph on the code charts is also included in one modern internal system in ROK as U+F016B.