Date | Description |
---|
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-20713 | 1.0 |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-20713 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E0DE |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 128.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 10 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 4 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 16 |
i) IDS | ⿱記耳 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《梵音斗科》(清雍正初刊本)卷下 folio 22 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-20713-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 唐荊川先生纂輯武編(明萬曆刊本)卷前六 folio 78b
▲ 武編前集(文淵閣四庫全書本)卷6 folio 92a
The evidence UK provided is from a book named "梵音斗科". ⿱記耳 is only found in this book, which is written and published by Mr. Lou Jinyuan(娄近垣) in the Qing Dynasty.
Considering that:
• ⿱記耳 is seen only in a song for a special ceremony to communicate with a God. Meanwhile, the ceremony was recorded only in the book "梵音斗科". The book has not been reorganized and published again since its initial publication, and the ideographs have not been quoted by anyone.
• Mr. Lou Jinyuan(娄近垣) should be famous at least among the Daoists in the Qing Dynasty. But we don't know if he is still well-known nowadays. The submitter didn't provide any related illustrations.
• The submitter didn't explain the rationale of ⿱記耳. For self-published books, ideographs used in them can be created very freely.
So:
After analysis, we can find that there are one or two factors that argue for encoding, but two or three factors that argue against encoding. Since it is not required for use in government databases, I think it is reasonable to ask for further investigation.