Character Info
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #58 2022-03-16 (Wed) 11:01 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𡆶 U+211B6, non cognate. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 3.0 | For 00766, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𡆶 U+211B6, non-cognate, IRG 58." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| UK-20544 |  1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | UK |
| a) Source reference | UK-20544 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E974 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 31.0 |
| d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 4 |
| e) First Stroke (Primary) | 1 |
| f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
| f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 7 |
| i) IDS | ⿴囗旡 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k1) References to evidence documents | 路迪民："亳州老君碑古字谱考释" in 《武当》（2007-06） pp. 20–21 |
| k2) Images Filenames | UK-20540-001.jpg |
| l) Other Information | N/A |
| m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
| m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
Possibly unifiable with 𡆶 (U+211B6).
Is there explanation for the character why the inside should be exactly 旡 instead of 无?
▲ 羅泌：《路史》，文淵閣四庫全書本，卷十七
As the new evidence in #5305, UK-20544 can't be identified as 模, and the new evidence in #5277 has shown it's the variant of 息 in Taoist text. Therefore, it's not better to unify it with 𡆶 U+211B6.