«
00803
00804
00805
»
00804
32.0 土
𢀖
SC=5, FS=5 TS=8

GDM-00281
Not unified to WS2017-00683 GDM-00205 due to non-cognate; different meanings and prononciations, IRG 57.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
unify to WS2017-00683 GDM-00205 or not?

Based on UCV #87, they should be unified, and the pronunciations are both jìnɡ, but WS2017-00683 GDM-00205 is used in Beiliu, Guangxi, which maybe it is a Zhuang character, and WS2021-00804 GDM-00281 is used in Hubei.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-05-30 08:15:44 UTC
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
We have found a local people lived in 上⿰土圣, the pronounciation of ⿰土圣 is tʰan44 and we have recorded it. The pronounciation provided by China is wrong. So they are not congnate.
Xieyang WANG
Individual
2021-06-01 05:40:21 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
Corresponding traditional form ⿰土巠 is not encoded or proposed for encoding.
Andrew WEST
UK
2023-01-19 21:37:33 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
Please confirm the source name of Evidence 2.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2023-01-29 00:53:54 UTC
Other
OTHER
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
The evidence of the traditional form is shown as below.


▲ 周凱: 《厦門志》, 道光刻本, 卷二

It looks this character is used for the geographical names widely in Southern China, Chinese Southwestern Mandarin-dialects, Wuchuan-Huazhou sub-dialects of Chinese Yue-dialects, Chinese Minnan-Dialects and so on. In almost all the cases, this character could be written as 径 as well, but 加浆~ is often written as 加浆劲 for the local people.



I have no plan to add the language tag for this character at this step.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2023-01-29 01:14:22 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v5.0
[ Resolved ]
The source name of Evidence 2 is
鄂城县地名领导小组办公室:湖北省鄂城县地名志,1981年4月,P203
Xieyang WANG
Individual
2023-10-07 01:25:01 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #57
2021-09-14 (Tue)
8:48 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
not unified to WS2017-00683 GDM-00205, different meanings and prononciations.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 00804, add Discussion Record "Not unified to WS2017-00683 GDM-00205 due to non-cognate; different meanings and prononciations, IRG 57."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
GDM-00281
1.0

Raw Info
groupChina (GDM - Place Name Characters)
a) Source referenceGDM-00281
b) PUA Code of TTFE297
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary)32.0
d) Stroke Count(Primary)5
e) First Stroke(Primary)5
g) Total Stroke Count8
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence)⿰土𢀖
j) Similar/ Variants N/A
k) Ref. to Evidence doc中国地名通名集解 八辅