«
01037
01038
01039
»
01038
40.0 宀
SC=7, FS=1 TS=10

GDM-00312
IRGN2606WS2021v5.0Pending
Postponed for more evidence, IRG 60.
Not unified to 崁 U+5D01, additional evidence requested, IRG 59.
U+5D01U+5D01
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
It looks the variant of 崁.

The evidence shows the character is used for the geographic name in the southern end of Taiwan Island. As the famous historical and cultural site, 赤崁樓 / 赤嵌樓, 崁 and 嵌 are common in Taiwan. If one character used for the common geographic names in Taiwan, TCA should handle this character well. In fact, this character has not been included in CNS 11643 yet.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2022-06-23 12:38:17 UTC
Unification
UCV
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
Also see WS2021-00138 and 01060.

I still think it is dangerous to make the UCV for 宀 & 山 for our future encoding works.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2022-06-23 12:43:55 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
Agree to comment #6670.
In addition, regarding the content of the evidence, in Taiwan, there is only "崁" in place names, "嵌" is rare, but there is no "⿱宀坎".
According to 陳正祥's statistics quoted in the evidence, the font should be "崁".

陳正祥,《臺灣地名手冊》(臺灣省文獻委員會,1959年),P14.
https://tm.ncl.edu.tw/article?u=007_101_000009&lang=chn
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2022-07-08 06:21:35 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
I suggest China to withdraw the character.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2022-07-29 14:20:44 UTC
Evidence
NEW_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
It is included in 《八辅》

And the article doesn't say 赤崁 is written as 赤⿱宀坎 but 赤嵌. As to this article, the anthor just list all characters used as same meaning and then give statement about all of them .
What's more, it's used in Fujian Province too.
Xieyang WANG
Individual
2022-10-18 02:56:53 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
When we say if one character is used or useful for one place, the proponent must provide at least one piece of sufficient evidence. If not, I agree with Henry for suggesting China to withdraw the character based on the discussion result.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2023-01-13 01:07:36 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
I think IRG encode not only characters used or useful for one place, but also characters used in books which can be schoolars' references. The shape in the evidence is clear enough, what's more, 山 and 宀 can be written as each other when used on the head of a character, so the shape is reasonalbe. So I don't think it should be withdrawed. Rejecting this character will only lead to a later resubmition.
Xieyang WANG
Individual
2023-03-15 04:09:59 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v4.0
[ Resolved ]
李如龙:地名与语言学论集,福州:福建省地图出版社,1993年8月,P145

It is a print error. I will find another good evidence for the character and come back again.
Xieyang WANG
Individual
2023-03-18 11:55:37 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #60
2023-03-23 (Thu)
10:51 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Pending for more evidence
IRG #59
2022-10-18 (Tue)
8:37 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Not unified to 崁 (U+5D01), additonal evidence asked for.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
4.0
For 01038, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 崁 U+5D01, additional evidence requested, IRG 59."
5.0
For 01038, change Status to Postponed
5.0
For 01038, add Discussion Record "Postponed for more evidence, IRG 60."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
GDM-00312
1.0

Raw Info
groupChina (GDM - Place Name Characters)
a) Source referenceGDM-00312
b) PUA Code of TTFE2B6
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary)40.0
d) Stroke Count(Primary)7
e) First Stroke(Primary)1
g) Total Stroke Count10
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence)⿱宀坎
j) Similar/ Variants N/A
k) Ref. to Evidence doc试论陕西地名用字中的生僻字、土俗字、方言字及地名标准化处理,载 地名学研究文集八辅