According to TCA norms, the silk radical should be normalized to 糹.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.

Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.

ISO/IEC 10646 and the Unicode Standard are not glyph registers. The glyph should be normalized following TCA conventions regardless of the use of one individual person.

IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.

We agree that "ISO/IEC 10646 and the Unicode Standard are not glyph registers." It is a character-based register, and each character is allowed to have a different glyph, which is why ISO/IEC 10646 codes are presented in multiple columns.
The origin of this character is a name character, and we cannot change it at will. If we change it to [艹], the character will not be used on the ID card, so we are creating a character that no one uses, and we are losing the intent of the character we submitted.
Please see IRGN2546 for more information on the normalization of the TCA glyph.