> The glyph shown in the evidence is suspicious because no other encoded character ...
> Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) ...
==>
The evidence is "Passers List for Scholarly Degrees [司馬榜目, Sama bangmok]" published by the government during Joseon Dynasty and, therefore, it is highly unlikely that there is an error in the evidence. KR suggests that it not be unified to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A).
- 1b: whether to unify WS2021-SN01288 and 霦 U+9726?
if two are cognate -> unify them and encode WS2021-SN01288 using IVD
if two are non-cognate -> disunify them and encode WS2021-SN01288.
1) At the time of reviewing ExtF, KR did not apply Korea Normalization rules.
. Initially suggested KR glyph of U+2D5D9 was nearly the same as UK-20468 (shown below).
. During IRG discussion, IRG asked KR to modify the glyph to look as the evidence and that glyph is shown in U+2D5D9.
. Note. KR started apllying Korea Norm. Rules with ExtG.
2) KR wants to keep the current glyph of U+2D5D9.
3) KR suggests to disunify UK-20468 from U+2D5D9.
. 睂 is an old form of 眉.
. When the old form and modern form are much different, in many cases, two were separately encoded.
. Other examples: 㪅 - 更; 攷- 考; 叜- 叟
> HUANG Junliang, Individual, 2022-10-05 10:19 +0900, #9060
> ... KC-03744 （⿰虗兮）. However I don't know how to find the original evidence.
> Can Korea provide the original evidence of ⿰虗兮?
- KR agrees with Mr. Lee Collins
- KR did not see any document containing UTC-03190 glyph.
- When a new evidence containing UTC-03190 glyph is provided in the future, KR will review the evidence and post KR opinion. Until then, KR suggests not to encode UTC-03190.
- KR agrees with Mr. Lee Collins
- KR did not see any document containing UTC-03191 glyph.
- When a new evidence containing UTC-03191 glyph is provided in the future, KR will review the evidence and post KR opinion. Until then, KR suggests not to encode UTC-03191.
IRG did not discuss and make a decision, which explains why KR did not send a modified glyph (font) to IRG.
When and if IRG decides to change the glyph of SN01413 / KC 05106, KR will submit a modified glyph to IRG.
Note. There are five other KR-submitted glyphs which need be modified but have not been discussed and IRG did not make decisions. Five SNs are: 00071, 00084, 00180, 00338, 00592
IRG Working Set 2021v3.0
Source: KIM Kyongsok
Date: Generated on 2026-07-26
Unification
- U+8668 虨 and WS2021-SN01289 (KC-05060) are two distinct chars.
- the two chars (one in a blue box, the other in red box) are two distinct persons' names
> Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) ...
==>
The evidence is "Passers List for Scholarly Degrees [司馬榜目, Sama bangmok]" published by the government during Joseon Dynasty and, therefore, it is highly unlikely that there is an error in the evidence. KR suggests that it not be unified to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A).
(a decision on 2022-10-18)
SN 3175 unified to SN 3178, keep SN 3178
==>
(a new decision)
SN 3178 unified to SN 3175, keep SN 3175
(a decision on 2022-10-18)
SN 3175 unified to SN 3178, keep SN 3178
==>
(a new decision)
SN 3178 unified to SN 3175, keep SN 3175
- 1a: U+8668 虨 is NOT a variant of 霦 U+9726
- 1b: whether to unify WS2021-SN01288 and 霦 U+9726?
if two are cognate -> unify them and encode WS2021-SN01288 using IVD
if two are non-cognate -> disunify them and encode WS2021-SN01288.
. Initially suggested KR glyph of U+2D5D9 was nearly the same as UK-20468 (shown below).
. During IRG discussion, IRG asked KR to modify the glyph to look as the evidence and that glyph is shown in U+2D5D9.
. Note. KR started apllying Korea Norm. Rules with ExtG.
2) KR wants to keep the current glyph of U+2D5D9.
3) KR suggests to disunify UK-20468 from U+2D5D9.
. 睂 is an old form of 眉.
. When the old form and modern form are much different, in many cases, two were separately encoded.
. Other examples: 㪅 - 更; 攷- 考; 叜- 叟
Evidence
> ... KC-03744 （⿰虗兮）. However I don't know how to find the original evidence.
> Can Korea provide the original evidence of ⿰虗兮?
You will find the evidence for KC-03744
- KR did not see any document containing UTC-03190 glyph.
- When a new evidence containing UTC-03190 glyph is provided in the future, KR will review the evidence and post KR opinion. Until then, KR suggests not to encode UTC-03190.
- KR did not see any document containing UTC-03191 glyph.
- When a new evidence containing UTC-03191 glyph is provided in the future, KR will review the evidence and post KR opinion. Until then, KR suggests not to encode UTC-03191.
Glyph Design & Normalization
IRG N2549 ROK Response (2022.10.14) (filename="IRGN2549KRResp1.pdf")
==>
IRG did not discuss and make a decision, which explains why KR did not send a modified glyph (font) to IRG.
When and if IRG decides to change the glyph of SN01413 / KC 05106, KR will submit a modified glyph to IRG.
Note. There are five other KR-submitted glyphs which need be modified but have not been discussed and IRG did not make decisions. Five SNs are: 00071, 00084, 00180, 00338, 00592