(v4.0) (v1.0) KC-05106 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #59 2022-10-18 (Tue) 9:44 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | pending for ROK response. |
IRG #59 2022-10-19 (Wed) 10:03 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Glyph to be updated to match ⿰忄⿱宷日. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 01413, change Stroke Count to 14 |
2.0 | For 01413, change Total Stroke Count to 17 |
2.0 | For 01413, change IDS to ⿰忄⿱宷日 |
2.0 | For 01413, add Discussion Record "SC=14, TS=17, IDS=⿰忄⿱宷日, 2021-10." |
4.0 | For 01413, add Discussion Record "Glyph to be updated to ⿰忄⿱宷日, IRG 59." |
4.0 | For 01413, add Discussion Record "Glyph updated, 2022-12." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
KC-05106 | 1.0 🢂 4.0 |
group | ROK |
a) Source reference | KC-05106 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | EE7D |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | R061.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 18 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 4 |
g) Total stroke count | 21 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰忄瀋 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 韓國學中央硏究院 司馬榜目 |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
The glyph shown in the evidence is suspicious because no other encoded character has the component ⿱宷日. It is possibly an error for U+2AB3A 𪬺 (K5-01E2). Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) if cognate.
On 2021-09-02, KR already mentioned that KR will change the glyph, IDS, SC, TS as suggested by Eiso (田 -> 日)
This is used in a personal name and therefore KR suggests not to unify.
==>
IRG did not discuss and make a decision, which explains why KR did not send a modified glyph (font) to IRG.
When and if IRG decides to change the glyph of SN01413 / KC 05106, KR will submit a modified glyph to IRG.
Note. There are five other KR-submitted glyphs which need be modified but have not been discussed and IRG did not make decisions. Five SNs are: 00071, 00084, 00180, 00338, 00592
> Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) ...
==>
The evidence is "Passers List for Scholarly Degrees [司馬榜目, Sama bangmok]" published by the government during Joseon Dynasty and, therefore, it is highly unlikely that there is an error in the evidence. KR suggests that it not be unified to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A).
We can find 朴恂 in 『정묘식년사마방목(丁卯(1653)式年司馬榜目)』:
Note that their father's information here is consistent. Here we can learn that 朴恂 has a brother named 朴恦 and 朴贒 was still alive as of 1653.
▲ 『정묘식년사마방목(丁卯(1653)式年司馬榜目)』.
I think 朴恦 and 朴⿰忄⿱宷日 probably refer to the same person. Maybe 朴恦 changed his name. After all changing name is not very uncommon as we can see in the page above, 李澐 changed his name to 李沇.
For character 𪬺, I couldn't find more evidences for 朴𪬺. But we do have 李𪬺 in 承政院日記 승정원일기 821책 (탈초본 45책) 영조 12년 3월 12일 병오 29/31 기사, suggesting that 𪬺 is also a name character.
The website people.aks.ac.kr is also normalizing ⿰忄⿱宷日 to 𪬺, which suggests that they could be unifiable:
Many data provided by HUANG Junliang are extracted from Internet.
They are digitalized data, NOT the original documents.
KR suggests that he provide original documents, NOT the digitalized data, to facilitate discussion.