Character Info
01270
 SAT-09507 |
IRGN2932WS2024v5.0Pending
SC=10, TS=13, pending discussion of a new UCV rule, IRG 66.
SC=10, TS=13, pending discussion of a new UCV rule, IRG 66.
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #66 2026-03-17 (Tue) 8:56 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | attributes to be updated, pending for new ucv discussion. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 5.0 | For 01270, change Stroke Count to 10 |
| 5.0 | For 01270, change Total Stroke Count to 13 |
| 5.0 | For 01270, change Status to Postponed |
| 5.0 | For 01270, add Discussion Record "SC=10, TS=13, pending discussion of a new UCV rule, IRG 66." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| SAT-09507 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| Character Reference | SAT-09507 |
| Codepoint | F169 |
| Radical | 46.0 |
| Stroke Count | 11 |
| First Stroke | 2 |
| Total Stroke | 14 |
| IDS | ⿱山𮲡 |
| Variants | 兾冀䔬 |
| Total No. of Evidences | 2 |
| Notes | Similar and synonym: 兾/冀/ Similar but semantically different: 䔬/ |
Review Comments
Unify to [WS2021-01170] ⿱山異 (Ext. J U+32778)
The kFanqie property value for 悶 is 莫困, and the evidences show the fanqie is 鄙～.
悶: 明母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (被切字)
莫: 明母宕攝唐韻開口一等入聲 (反切上字)
困: 溪母臻攝魂韻合口一等去聲 (反切下字)
That means the fanqie matches the character 悶.
However, 鄙 is 幫母 and 三等, that means the reading of character 被切字 should be 齐齿呼. 幫母 and 明母 are not totally the same.
鄙: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等上聲 (反切上字)
At least, the submitted character should be as below.
？母臻攝魂韻合口三等(?)去聲 (反切下字)
The kFanqie property value for 閟 is 兵媚.
閟: 幫母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (被切字)
兵: 幫母梗攝庚韻開口三等平聲 (反切上字)
媚: 明母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (反切下字)
And the usage of 鄙 is the same as 兵 as the shengmu (声母), that means the submitted character should be as below.
？母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲
On the other hand, 異 is shown as below. (羊吏切)
以母止攝之韻開口三等去聲
脂韻 and 之韻 are very close in middle Chinese, so we can guess the submitted character should be as below.
以母止攝脂韻開口三等去聲 (Putonghua reading: yì)
That means the unification request on Comment #8 is also acceptable.
Unify to (U+32778)
[WS2021-01170]
See Comments #8, #4213, #4214, #4246.