The middle component in the evidence is "公" but the proposed glyph uses "厷".

The glyph has been normalized based on the given analysis for this entry: "xích hùng", i.e. 赤雄.

⿰公隹 has not been encoded, but we can add ⿰公隹 and 雄 as UCV pair. ⿰公隹 is OK to encode separately later.

As Eiso mentioned in #8545, it may be necessary to add the following UCV: ⿰公隹 and 雄.

越喃汉英四文对照新辞典，上海交通大学出版社，2023年，page400

"Kho Chữ Hán Nôm Mã Hoà" also has ⿰赤⿰公隹. So, while this is not the normal form for the phonetic 雄 "hùng", we could revert the normalization to use ⿰公隹 if that is more acceptable.