Change Radical to 177.0 (革), SC=22, FS=4

I'd still like to see an image of the original material since the glyph is unusual and Ming royal personal names could be unstable.

Here is an earlier historical record dated 順治元年8月30日, a copy of the letter written by the person mentioned in the original evidence:


▲ 朱充⿰革⿱亠㸑、朱廷𥳕《原大同代府宗室鎮國中尉臣朱充⿰革⿱亠㸑同男臣朱廷𥳕等謹啟為新恩沛及絶國等事》（內閣大庫檔案 Grand Secretariat Archives 185045-035）page 1

The character ⿰革⿱亠㸑 is also attested in contemporary dictionary 《題韻直音篇》:


▲ 《題韻直音篇》（明天順序刊本）卷7 folio 13b

Based on the evidences above, it is likely that ⿰革⿳亠⿱⿴𦥑同冖灭 is a variant of ⿰革⿱亠㸑, which, according to 《題韻直音篇》, is a variant of 𩍴/𩎑.

If the new evidences are accepted, I suggest updating the glyph to ⿰革⿱亠㸑 to align with one of the earliest record of this person and the shape in the contemporary dictionary.