| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 10:18 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | pending for further evidences from Tao Yang. |
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 2:11 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | keep in m set, non cognate. |
| IRG #63 2024-10-23 (Wed) 9:37 am +0900 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | evidence accepted. |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 03593, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, IRG 63." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| KC-10053 |
| Character Reference | KC-10053 |
| Codepoint | E098 |
| Radical | R154.0 |
| Stroke Count | 11 |
| First Stroke | 1 |
| Total Stroke | 18 |
| IDS | ⿰貝㒼 |
| Pronunciation | 만 |
| Normalization Ref. | N/A |
| Total No. of Evidences | 1 |
| Notes | - a semi-cursive form (行書) of '㒼'. - KR will add a new Norm. rule in the next version of KR Normalization Rrules. |
Review Comments
We need to understand what this character mean, and then to confirm if it is suitable to unify it with U+27E15 𧸕.
KR will unify this char, SN 03593/KC-10053, to 𧸕 (U+27E15) if IRG decides to allow KR to make a horizontal extension to U+27E15 with the glyph as submitted (the right upper portion of the KR-submitted glyph.is somewhat different from the one in the U+27E15).
The G glyph quotes GHZ:
However, per the MOE dictionary, one version of the original source writes it as ⿰貝㒼
Kangxi Zidian and the followers used another glyph as:
The more common variant of U+27E15 𧸕 is:
[明]陳士元撰,古俗字略/補/漢碑用字/俗用雜字,10巻, 明萬曆刻歸雲別集本
[明]陳藎謨撰[清]吳任臣補輯,元音統韻,86巻,清康熙五十三年范廷瑚刻本
Another variant is:
It can be found in the following evidences:
It's obvious that the character KC-10053 is the variant of U+779E 瞞, which is non-cognate with U+27E15 𧸕. The glyph of KC-10053 could be normalized to ⿱艹雨(which I prefer) or 㒼, and no need to be unified to U+27E15 𧸕.
In the meanwhile, there are 4 series of variant glyph for U+27E15 𧸕.
④ ⑤ are the glyphs which U+27E15 𧸕 origined from, ① ② ③ are the correct original glyphs for it.
⑥ ⑦ ⑧ may share the glyph with the variant of U+779E 瞞. ⑨ is another kind of variant glyph.
So the glyph of U+27E15 𧸕 doesn't need to be changed, and the other 3 kind of variant should be encoded separately in future.
② is already encoded at 𧸅 U+27E05
① and ③ can be unified to it if they are submitted in the future.