The glyph source of U+3018D is also from Oracle Bone script, same as "御". Additionally, according to UCV#343a 卩、阝, WS24-03832 might be unified with 𰆍 (U+3018D).
Based on evidence 2 provided by SAT, the lower-left component of the character is “由”.
In 《正字通》.巳集.火部, it is written as ⿰⿱⺈𠙹炎. It is speculated that the SAT-09585 glyph evolved from this form.
SAT may consider changing the glyph to ⿰⿱⺈由炎 (or ⿰⿱⺈𠙹炎?).
IRG Working Set 2024v3.0
Source: Conifer TSENG
Date: Generated on 2026-08-19
Unification
Showing 13 comments.
The glyph source of U+3018D is also from Oracle Bone script, same as "御". Additionally, according to UCV#343a 卩、阝, WS24-03832 might be unified with 𰆍 (U+3018D).
https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2015/app/?find=UK-01336
徐中舒,《甲骨文字典》「御」,p.166-168.
These two characters have different structures and different meanings.
T13-3D5A and U+56A6 are non-cognate.
TB-6072 and U+2484E differ in two parts, and TB-6072 is used in a company name.
TB-7D3F and U+2E246 differ in right parts, and TB-7D3F is used in a company name.
The reading of TB-7D57 is fú.
𦍚 is a variant of 羔, whereas these three characters differ in meaning.
No UCV rule applies. The shape and pronunciation are different.
TC-2D55 is used in personal names and is unrelated to literary usage.
Per UCV #46, TCA agree to unify to 𫃛 (U+2B0DB).
The overall structure differs from 鸞, and the stroke count is also different.
Attributes
Showing 26 comments.
粵=U+7CB5
Evidence
Showing 10 comments.
桊
In 《正字通》.巳集.火部, it is written as ⿰⿱⺈𠙹炎. It is speculated that the SAT-09585 glyph evolved from this form.
SAT may consider changing the glyph to ⿰⿱⺈由炎 (or ⿰⿱⺈𠙹炎?).
《龍龕手鏡(高麗本),白部》
《中華字海‧白部》
1.
[曼朱院本]萬葉集 卷3
2.万葉集(まんようしゅう)(Man'youshuu)
3. 活字無訓本・「萬葉集. 巻3-4」国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 7 comments.
Please confirm whether the right component should be 火 or 大
.
"⿰㘴刂" is a variant of "剉". The glyph in Evidence 2 & 3 should better match the 剉斬 description.
Other
Showing 2 comments.
The glyph SAT-10016 is thought to have evolved from "⿹&H6-03; ⿲中丶丶".