According to evidence 1, the glyph is written as [⿺尼常].

Agreed update glyph to ⿺尼常.

Update IDS to ⿺尼常.

FS=1

The glyph has not been updated yet to ⿺尼常.

Change the glyph.

See the glyphs which have been encoded, 8 ⿰尼X & 2 ⿺尼X:
⿰尼X
U+4CBF
U+2389E
U+23670
U+2B8A9
U+2D557
U+2DDB5
U+2D571
U+2E97B

⿺尼X
U+3037C
U+3165C

I prefer not to change the glyph of 01159 temporarily.

Reply to Comment #14420.

The submitted character is a Zhuang character. In Comment #14420, U+3037C 𰍼 and U+3165C 𱙜 are also Zhuang characters.




For U+3165C 𱙜 (reads as ndi*), the semantic element is 好, and the phonetic element is 尼 (新借niz).

For U+3037C 𰍼 and the submitted character, we need to know an unencoded character first.
⿺尼冷 reads nit, and the semantic element is 冷, the phonetic element is 尼.

▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 383
Therefore, the rationale of U+3037C 𰍼 (reads as dot) and the submitted character (reads as ciengz*) are that the semantic elements are both the omitted form of ⿺尼冷, and the phonetic elements are 夺 (新借doz, 老接dued) and 常 (新借cangz, 老借ciengz).

That means the structures for these characters are stable, and match the rationale. Therefore, the glyph must be updated to match the submitted evidence. Other characters (⿰尼X) are not related to this type.