«
02112
02113
02114
»
02113
85.0 水
SC=9, FS=5, TS=12

GZ-4722601
IRGN2809WS2024v3.0Pending
Postponed for further investigation of glyph, IRG 63.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Evidence
MISIDENTIFIED_GLYPH
WS2024 v1.0
[ Unresolved ]
In evidence 1, the bottom right of this glyph is "且".
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2024-09-02 08:18:48 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2024 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
《古壮字大字典》(2022)
Xieyang WANG
China
2024-09-03 03:34:35 UTC
Evidence
MISIDENTIFIED_GLYPH
WS2024 v1.0
[ Unresolved ]
We once discussed the similar glyph issue at WS2017-01024. Also see John’s document.

The Zhuang reading of U+316B9 𱚹 is sux*. For the standard reading, the tone mark -x/-ч corresponds to 阳上 (John said this reading is used in Longzhou Zhuang), but the tone of 昼 should be 阴去 (-q/-ƽ). On the other hand, the middle Chinese finals (韵母) of 手 and 昼 are the same, and one 老借 reading of 手 I collected is suj; that 知母 reads as [s-]/[θ-] is very common. For common 腔词结合 rule in Cantonese Yueju Opera, Cantonese Yuequ Show and Cantonese pop songs, 阳上 (Tone 5) and 阴去 (Tone 3) could mean to the same musical scale, such as 上 (Gongche) for 平喉.

The semantic rationale of U+316B9 𱚹 in Zhuang and Tày is still NOT obvious. If it is the way like 臼 and 旧, 幺 and 么 to distinguish the meanings, the submitted glyph is acceptable; if we can not confirm this, it is better to change the glyph to match the evidence.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2024-11-14 08:07:44 UTC
Evidence
MISIDENTIFIED_GLYPH
WS2024 v2.0
[ Resolved ]
Further investigation confirmed the glyph in the evidences is correct and therefore the submitted glyph and IDS should be change to match the evidences.

Re comments #2119 and #2220: the bottom right should be "且" or, in other words, the right hand part should be U+316B9 𱚹.

Re comment #5928: both ⿰氵𱚹 suz (a hole) and U+316B9 𱚹 sux (to know) are Longzhou Zhuang words. They follow the an established pattern for common and uncommon words.The character used for a common words can not be broken down and is memorised by rote. The character for less a common word consists of a memorised by rote character used as a phonetic combined with a semantic radical and that the tone of the phonetic part is ignored, just the sound is used.
John Knightley
China
2025-02-25 00:59:22 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2024 v3.0
[ New ]
Based on the above discussion, the conclusion is that the glyph and IDS should be changed to ⿰氵𱚹
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
2025-07-17 21:00:07 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2024 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
Should be returned to M-set, there is not unification issue here, the current glyph and the proposed ⿰氵𱚹 glyph are unifiable, which design to use is a matter for the submitter to decide.
John Knightley
China
2025-10-09 14:01:55 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #65
2025-10-14 (Tue)
3:08 pm +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
back to m set.
IRG #63
2024-10-23 (Wed)
9:21 am +0900
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Postponed for further investigation of glyph.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 02113, change Status to Postponed
2.0
For 02113, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further investigation of glyph, IRG 63."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
GZ-4722601
1.0

Raw Info
Character ReferenceGZ-4722601
CodepointE3BE
Radical85.0
Stroke Count9
First Stroke5
Total Stroke12
IDS⿰氵昼
VariantsN/A
Pronunciationsuz
Normalization Ref.N/A
Total No. of Evidences1
NotesOriginal PUA codepoint: F6A41.