«
00764
00765
00766
»
00765
31.0 囗
SC=3, FS=2 TS=4

SAT-04332
IRGN2632WS2021v6.0Pending
Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Evidence
MISIDENTIFIED_GLYPH
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Shinpukuji 真福寺 / Ōsu bunko 大須文庫 manuscript of 釋摩訶衍論 (https://kotenseki.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100213326/viewer/421) shows ⿴〇内.
Andrew WEST
UK
2021-07-18 14:35:35 UTC
Evidence
MISIDENTIFIED_GLYPH
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
This early printed edition of 釋摩訶衍論 (しゃくまかえんろん) dated 建長8 =1256 (https://kotenseki.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100213241/viewer/511) also shows ⿴〇内.
Andrew WEST
UK
2021-07-18 15:14:46 UTC
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE (Response)
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Our woodblock evidence is from Tripitaka Koreana created 1236-1251, so it proves at least two variants were widely circulated at that time (or maybe Korea and Japan traditions). The ⿴〇内 variant also appears in Taisho Tripitaka, but we currently plan to use this one as the representative form as it is consistently used in the body, and the other as IVS.
WANG Yifan
SAT
2021-07-26 07:43:51 UTC
Evidence
NEW_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
Glyph in 房山石經 inscription (this part from Liao dynasty 916-1125).
WANG Yifan
SAT
2021-07-27 05:50:09 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
I suggest other method on encoding this character in my feedback on IRGN2492.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-09-13 14:07:13 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2021 v4.0
[ Unresolved ]
The character under 12 and 13 in the submitted evidence has been encoded as U+2D5B2 𭖲.
U+2D5B2


However, the current SAT-05235 glyph for U+2D5B2 𭖲 doesn’t match the source and #2388, so maybe SAT should update the glyph later.

On the other hand, all the evidence shows U+2D5B2 𭖲 has the fanqie as the common Hanzi/Kanji. And the situation of the submitted character is the same as U+2D5B2 𭖲.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2023-02-06 15:00:34 UTC
Other
COMMENT
WS2021 v4.0
[ Unresolved ]
Simplest solution is to encode the character as a CJK unified ideograph, so I suggest to move SAT-04332 back to the Main Set.
Andrew WEST
UK
2023-02-06 16:29:51 UTC
Evidence
NEW_EVIDENCE
WS2021 v4.0
[ Unresolved ]

ISO/IEC TR 10036:2020, glyph identifier 10074392
https://www.iso.org/standard/79490.html
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2023-03-16 02:15:01 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v6.0
[ New ]
Evidence is sufficient, and it is not practical to consider an alternative encoding method. Therefore move back to the M-set.
Andrew WEST
UK
2024-02-20 18:59:05 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #57
2021-09-17 (Fri)
9:29 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Postponed for further investigation on encoding model.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 00765, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57."
2.0
For 00765, change Status to Postponed

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
SAT-04332
1.0

Raw Info
groupSAT
a) Source referenceSAT-04332
b) PUA Code of TTFF124
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary)031.0
d) Stroke Count(Primary)3
e) First Stroke(Primary)2
g) Total Stroke Sount4
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence)⿴〇?
j) Similar/ Variants N/A
k) Ref. to Evidence docSAT-04332-01.jpg;SAT-04332-02.jpg
l) Optional infoN/A
m1)Previous IRG WSN/A
m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WSN/A