Date | Description |
---|
Version | Description |
---|---|
7.0 | For 02243, change IDS to ⿱⿲幺言幺灬 |
7.0 | For 02243, add Discussion Record "IDS=⿱⿲幺言幺灬, 2024-04." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
SAT-08382 | 1.0 |
group | SAT |
a) Source reference | SAT-08382 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | F223 |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 086.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 13 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 4 |
g) Total Stroke Sount | 17 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿱𮘎灬 |
j) Similar/ Variants | Similar: 䜌/𮘎/ |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-08382-01.jpg;SAT-08382-02.jpg |
l) Optional info | N/A |
m1)Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
The character being discussed in the first piece of evidence is 𤼙 (U+24F19). The evidence says that the element WS2021-02243-SAT-08382, presumably the same element as the 䜌 in 𤼙 (U+24F19), can also be written as 攣, resulting in 癴 (U+7674). Kangxi supports the two as variants, saying 攣 = 俗𤼙字. The second evidence actually uses the component WS2021-02243-SAT-08382 to write a variant of 𤼙 (U+24F19).
Support Ken and Conifer.