GKJ-00464 |
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #59 2022-10-18 (Tue) 8:57 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Move to M set. Evidence accepted, Add new UCV by TAO Yang in comment #8341 |
| IRG #57 2021-09-16 (Thu) 11:10 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Postponed for further investigation |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 03599, change Status to Postponed |
| 2.0 | For 03599, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further investigation, IRG 57." |
| 4.0 | For 03599, change Status to OK |
| 4.0 | For 03599, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, add a new UCV rule of 𦕅 and 聊, IRG 59." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GKJ-00464 |
| group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
| a) Source reference | GKJ-00464 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E0FB |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 142.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 11 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 1 |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 17 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰虫聊 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 汉字海 [順治]河南通志 中华字海 [乾隆]永寧縣誌 |
Review Comments
See above comments for rationale. I don't think this character should be postponed.
Shunzhi version shows ⿰虫𦕅, but Yongzheng version shows ⿰虫聊. I suppose that ⿰虫聊 (liáo?) is the correct form as it likely rimes with 螬 cáo, and ⿰虫𦕅 is a contracted form due to the difficulty of writing ⿰虫聊 in the available space.
As 中华字海 and 雍正河南通志 both give ⿰虫聊 I suggest to accept the current glyph and IDS, and return GKJ-00464 to the M-set.
蝍GKJ-00464 or 蝍蟟 are the ancient forms of 知了. Obviously, ⿰虫聊 should be the correct glyph.
▲ 蠕范(清同治刊本)卷8 folio 28a
The evidence also presents an unencoded character ⿰虫野 (surrounded by a blue rectangle), presumably a variant of 𧐓.