Character Info
04108
 (v2.0)  (v1.0) GKJ-00934 |
IRGN2678WS2021v7.0Pending
Postponed for evidence, IRG 58.
Evidence accepted, glyph to be updated, IDS=⿱信金, IRG 57.
Postponed for evidence, IRG 58.
Evidence accepted, glyph to be updated, IDS=⿱信金, IRG 57.
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #58 2022-03-15 (Tue) 9:54 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Unified to WS2021-04106 |
| IRG #58 2022-03-15 (Tue) 9:57 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Postponed for evidence. |
| IRG #57 2021-09-17 (Fri) 8:54 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Evidence accepted, ids and glyph to be changed. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 04108, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, glyph to be updated, IDS=⿱信金, IRG 57." |
| 2.0 | For 04108, change IDS to ⿱信金 |
| 3.0 | For 04108, change Status to Postponed |
| 3.0 | For 04108, add Discussion Record "Postponed for evidence, IRG 58." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GKJ-00934 | 1.0 🢂 2.0 |
Raw Info
| group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
| a) Source reference | GKJ-00934 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E36A |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 167.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 9 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 3 |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 17 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰信金 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 |
Review Comments
Glyph dose not match the evidence, change the glyph.
In assessing the suitability of a proposed ideograph for encoding, IRG will evaluate the credibility and quality of the submitter's proposal. If IRG finds more than 5% of the submitter’s source set are duplicates of characters in the above mentioned proposals during IRG review process, the whole submission will be removed from the subsequent IRG working drafts for that particular IRG project. However, the 5% rule does not apply if the submitter explicitly raises questions about unification/dis-unification for concrete cases in the proposal of characters.
It should be noted that the 5% rule is a general yardstick to remind submitters to adhere to IRG submission requirements and do a good screening job before submission to reduce the workload of reviewers for quality review. In practice, most submissions should have problems within the 1% range. In this regard, submitters should not interpret the rule as submissions with problems within the 5% range will definitely be accepted. IRG has the right to review the problem cases and decide not to accept a submission even if it has problems within the 5% range (especially when the figure is very close to 5%).
So the number of duplicates is 34, 34/1223*100%=2.8%, it's not close to 5%.
However, this can be a reminder to China.
They are duplicates now.