Character Info
00020
 SAT-01301 |
IRGN2632WS2021v6.0Pending
Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57.
Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57.
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #57 2021-09-17 (Fri) 9:28 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Postponed for further investigation |
| IRG #57 2021-09-17 (Fri) 9:29 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Postponed for further investigation on encoding model. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 00020, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57." |
| 2.0 | For 00020, change Status to Postponed |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| SAT-01301 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | SAT |
| a) Source reference | SAT-01301 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | F110 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 002.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 3 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 1 |
| g) Total Stroke Sount | 4 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰丨キ |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-01301-01.jpg |
| l) Optional info | N/A |
| m1)Previous IRG WS | Ext. D |
| m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | 00066 |
Review Comments
https://www.iso.org/standard/79490.html
▲ 張深切: 《日語要領》, 北京: 新民印書館, 1942.9, p. 46
This author thought this one is like U+30FF ヿ, but not Japanese kokuji.
▲ 謝求生: 《文法中心現代日文綜合讀本》, 廣州: 廣州日文專脩館, 1936.9, p. 25
This author pointed out this one belongs to kana directly. I think all pieces of current evidence are sufficient to encode this one as kana in UCS and Unicode. tomo should be re-encoded as kana. As Andrew wrote, tomo is incorrectly encoded in Ext. C as U+2A708 𪜈, that was not a good choice for it.
▲ 小宫山博史; 孙明远: 《日文数字字体分类试案》//孙明远: 《方寸之间——汉字文字设计文集》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 2023.4, ISBN 978-7-5039-7395-6, p. 298
(This book has not been published when I post this picture here, but we have planned to publish this book in April, 2023. The chief editor, Prof. Sun Mingyuan, has agreed us to use this picture only in IRG review works.)
As this evidence shows clearly, this one is treated as Katakana, and U+2A708 𪜈 is also treated as Katakana. On the other hand, the Katakana like 井 and 子 have not been encoded yet. (Yifan has more knowledge on the Katakana like 井 and 子.)
▲ http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23112-missing-kana-ligatures.pdf, p. 3