VN-F1AF5 |
| Date | Description |
|---|
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 5.0 | For 00096, change Radical (Secondary) to 127.0 (耒) |
| 5.0 | For 00096, change Stroke Count (Secondary) to 2 |
| 5.0 | For 00096, change First Stroke (Secondary) to 5 |
| 5.0 | For 00096, add Discussion Record "R(2)=127.0 (耒), SC(2)=2, FS(2)=5, 2023-05." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| VN-F1AF5 |
| group | V |
| Source | VN-F1AF5 |
| Code | F1AF5 |
| Rad | 6 |
| Strk | 7 |
| FS | 3 |
| TS | 8 |
| IDS | ⿰耒了 |
| Var. | N/A |
| Evidence | VN-F1AF5.jpg |
| Reading | rồi |
| Note | N/A |
| Prev. WS | N/A |
| Prev. WS No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 慧琳: 《一切經音義》, 大正新修大藏經, 卷第七十六, p. 2128
▲ 釋慧琳: 《一切經音義》, 獅谷蓮社刻本, 卷第七十六
The new evidence shows the phonetic is 了, so it is necessary to use two radicals for this characters. I guess SAT can provide clearer evidence if needed.