11:33 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
|Unified to 𬅭 U+2C16D, add ucv ⿳士冖示 and ⿳士冖禾.|
For 01902, change Status to Unified
For 01902, add Discussion Record "Unified to 𬅭 U+2C16D, extend UCV rule #266 with ⿳士冖示, IRG 60."
|a) Source reference||TD-4A24|
|b) PUA Code of TTF||E396|
|c) KangXi Radical Code||76.0|
|e) Stroke Count||10|
|f) First Stroke||1|
|g) Total stroke count||14|
|j) Similar/ Variants||U+238D9|
|k) Ref. to Evidence doc||IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_02|
|k1) Page No.||Page12-13, no.651|
|l) Optional info||kuǎn|
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?
Both have the same reading, kuǎn; Perhaps extend, UCV i., Differences of extra or reduced stroke or dot, to 木 and 禾 where they are part of larger component, like ⿳士冖木 and ⿳士冖禾
Consider unify to 𬅭 (U+2C16D).
⿰𡉉欠 may not be regarded as an isolated abstract component. Considering all the characters with similar structure:
𬅭 ~ 款
⿰⿱〾𡉉方欠 (13-4E33) (kuǎn)
⿰⿱〾𡉉禾欠 (11-6151) (kuǎn)
They are all derived from 款. First a 冖 is added from the original glyph to form 𬅭, then the lower-left part 示 is changed to be 禾 to form [11-6151], then the 一 is deleted to form this [TD-4A24], then the 丿 is deleted to form 𣣙 (only one character with this ⿰⿳十冖A欠 structure).