Character Info
00619
 GZ-2352301 |
Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F, V horizontal extension noted, IRG 65.
Postponed for unification to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 64.
Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 63.
Postponed for unification to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 64.
Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 63.
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 9:23 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | back m set, Vietnam will make H extention for this character. |
| IRG #64 2025-03-18 (Tue) 10:53 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F |
| IRG #64 2025-03-18 (Tue) 10:56 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | further investation needed. |
| IRG #63 2024-10-22 (Tue) 9:53 am +0900 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 00619, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 63." |
| 3.0 | For 00619, change Status to Postponed |
| 3.0 | For 00619, add Discussion Record "Postponed for unification to 𠽏 U+20F4F, IRG 64." |
| 4.0 | For 00619, change Status to OK |
| 4.0 | For 00619, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𠽏 U+20F4F, V horizontal extension noted, IRG 65." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GZ-2352301 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| Character Reference | GZ-2352301 |
| Codepoint | E354 |
| Radical | 30.0 |
| Stroke Count | 13 |
| First Stroke | 2 |
| Total Stroke | 16 |
| IDS | ⿰口䧟 |
| Variants | N/A |
| Pronunciation | haemq |
| Normalization Ref. | N/A |
| Total No. of Evidences | 1 |
| Notes | Original PUA codepoint: F4F7A. |
Review Comments
Unify to 𠽏 (U+20F4F)?
If yes, we could expand UCV #90.
U+57F3 埳 ⿰土臽 vs U+586A 塪 ⿰土舀
U+60C2 惂 ⿰忄臽 vs U+6146 慆 ⿰忄舀
U+6390 掐 ⿰扌臽 vs U+642F 搯 ⿰扌舀
U+6DCA 淊 ⿰氵臽 vs U+6ED4 滔 ⿰氵舀
U+7130 焰 ⿰火臽 vs U+7196 熖 ⿰火舀
U+8AC2 諂 ⿰言臽 vs U+8B1F 謟 ⿰言舀
U+8F21 輡 ⿰車臽 vs U+8F41 轁 ⿰車舀
U+9921 餡 ⿰飠臽 vs U+9940 饀 ⿰飠舀
Unify to 𠽏 U+20F4F.
The provided evidence shows that the phonetic is 陷 (臽) without a doubt. The writing of 𠂊 as 爫 is fairly common and a number of other UCVs exist (e.g. 争 / 爭). Suggest to add a new UCV level 2 臽 and 舀.
The examples given in the URO are not all variants. For example, 諂 and 謟 are non-cognate.
Ngũ Thiên Tự (五千字), p. 34, reading "dèm"
In favour of unifiation to 𠽏 U+20F4F.
It is extremely clear that the right hand side phonetic should be 陷. This is a completely different phonetic from 舀. I don't agree that the semantics are hard to clarify for GZ-2352301.
Historically it is common for 𠂊 and 爫 to be swapped.
I don't understand why "Annex S records source separation examples" would imply not suitable for a new UCV. All examples in the Source Code Separation mean they were deemed unifiable, but not unified, because they are encoded separately in the original source tables.