GZHSJ-0067 |
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 4:46 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𠝧 U+20767, Change Radical to 124.0 (羽), SC=4, FS=5. |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 4.0 | For 00272, change Radical to 124.0 (羽) |
| 4.0 | For 00272, change Stroke Count to 4 |
| 4.0 | For 00272, change First Stroke to 5 |
| 4.0 | For 00272, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𠝧 U+20767, R=124.0 (羽), SC=4, FS=5, IRG 65." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GZHSJ-0067 |
| Character Reference | GZHSJ-0067 |
| Codepoint | E254 |
| Radical | 18.8 |
| Stroke Count | 8 |
| First Stroke | 5 |
| Total Stroke | 10 |
| IDS | ⿱羽𠚪 |
| Variants | Semantic Variant𠝧 |
| Pronunciation | lu4 |
| Total No. of Evidences | 2 |
| Notes | N/A |
| Secondary Radical | N/A |
| Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
Review Comments
Unify to 𠝧 (U+20767)?
They are both the semantic variant of 戮.
U+20767 𠝧
U+2641F 𦐟
U+26431 𦐱
U+2647E 𦑾
U+2678B 𦞋
U+31ED7 𱻗
U+31EDD 𱻝
I do not suggest that we allow more transcriptions. The IVD is precisely suitable for encoding these cases.
[唐]顔師古 撰 ,嚴旭 疏證 :《匡謬正俗疏證•卷第二•019【】》,中華書局,2019年10月,第1版,第47頁。
:張本朱校、明本、沈本、何本、惠本作「戮」;盧本原作「戮」,改作「」。按:《夏書·甘誓》、《商書·湯誓》「孥戮」字,宋薛季宣《書古文訓》、夏竦《古文四聲韻》皆作「𠝧」,與「」形近。《説文·羽部》「翏」字段注謂「」即「翏」之譌,假借爲「戮」字。劉曉東《平議》云迨衛包改爲今字,開成石經遂定作「戮」。盧本蓋欲改之以合篇題。
transcription 2 ⿰𫜹𫜹 (radical 𫜹):
[宋] 薛季宜 撰 書古文訓:十六卷
[明] 王三聘 撰 字学大全:三十二卷
[金] 邢准 撰 新修累音引證群籍玉篇:三十卷
[遼] 釋行均 撰 龍龕手鑒:四卷
transcription 3 traditional 羽 (radical 羽):
[清] 段玉裁 撰 說文解字注:三十卷,六書音均表:五卷
[遼] 釋行均 撰 龍龕手鑒:四卷
[宋] 丁度等 撰 集韻:十卷
The character got 3 kinds of trancription in ancient dictionaries with different radicals, all of them are valuable glyph for publish or philology.
The distinguishment is also existing in 台湾异体字字典.