| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #65 2025-10-14 (Tue) 3:06 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
| IRG #64 2025-03-19 (Wed) 11:00 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | not unified to 𪫢 (U+2AAE2). |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 3.0 | For 01437, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𪫢 U+2AAE2, IRG 64." |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| VN-F1FFC |
| Character Reference | VN-F1FFC |
| Codepoint | F1FFC |
| Radical | 61 |
| Stroke Count | 4 |
| First Stroke | 1 |
| Total Stroke | 7 |
| IDS | ⿰忄⿱匕⿺㇉一 |
| Variants | U+61DD |
| Pronunciation | [JY: ŋɤi1] |
| Total No. of Evidences | 1 |
| Notes | N/A |
| Radical 2 | N/A |
| Stroke Count 2 | N/A |
| First Stroke 2 | N/A |
Review Comments
Unify to 𪫢 (U+2AAE2).
Suggest to add ⿱匕⿺㇉一 and 𪟽 as UCV Lv.1 due to the cognition (both the simplified form of 疑, also see the small character in the parenthesis next to the character entry). It seems that the former one is preferred by the Jing nationality (京族) in China and the latter one is preferred by people in Vietnam. I do not think we need to encode both shapes separately.
Add new UCV for ⿱匕⿺㇉一 and 𫧇?