⿰氵𤉹

Evidence 1 gives ⿰氵𤉹, evidence 2 and 3 give ⿰氵𤉨.

Both ⿰氵𤉹 (F0377) and ⿰氵𤉨(F247B) are included in 中華書局宋體. Of course they are both variant of 㵄.

Since now we have more evidences of ⿰氵𤉨 than ⿰氵𤉹. Does china want to change the glyph to ⿰氵𤉨?

[清] 王梓材、冯云濠辑，宋元学案补遗，卷七十四，第八十三頁，杜洲门人
Change the glyph from ⿰氵𤉹 to ⿰氵𤉨.

［明］胡宗憲 等 纂修：《嘉靖浙江通志 藝文志·第八之四》，中華書局，2006年06月，第1版，第938頁，據《方志叢刊》所收嘉靖四十年刊本影印


［清］陸增祥 撰：《八瓊室元金石偶存·八瓊室元金石偶存》，吴興劉氏，1925年，第16頁。


𤉨 IS original. The shift from '𤉨' to '𤉹', from the ⿹AB to the ⿱AB, reflects a glyph normalization practice in modern Chinese printing. In my opinion, both glyph forms are acceptable in character encoding.