Unify to 𡝩 (U+21769)?

The structural changes of characters make it difficult for readers to associate the characters they see with the original ones, which is a type of variation second only to heterogeneous characters and far more valuable for preservation than variant characters with stroke variations. Variant characters with structural changes should be preserved as much as possible.

The first evidence is from《詩三家義集疏》, the original version indeed gives 𡝩:



▲ 《詩三家義集疏》（民國四年長沙王氏虛受堂刊本）卷1 folio 27

The second evidence is from《拜經樓詩集》, the original version also gives 𡝩:


▲ 《拜經樓詩集》（清嘉慶刊拜經樓叢書本）卷3 folio 20b

Based on these two evidences, ⿱艹妖 is a modern misinterpretation of 𡝩. Therefore the value to preserve such form might be questionable. Since ⿱艹妖 here is cognate with 𡝩, suggest to unify with 𡝩 (U+21769).

Thanks for the correction! Although rare, ⿱艹妖 does exist, and I will submit new evidences. The character 妖 is a clerical-script abbreviation of 𡝩, yet in the modern writing system, 妖 has become the standard form, while 𡝩 has faded into obscurity. This unfamiliarity with 𡝩 may explain why it is occasionally written as ⿱艹妖.
薛瑞兆 編撰 ：《新編全金詩•卷五二•王澮•感遇四首》，中華書局，2021年05月，第1版，第1366頁。

its original version 谷音二卷，民國十八年（1929）上海商務印書館影印本

錢仲聯 主編 ：《清詩紀事》，鳳凰出版社，2004年04月，第1版，第3361頁。

Need to examine evidence by SU Ruixin (comment #9342), just in case for ORG platform.