According to the original evidence 《［雍正］山東通志》, 朱慶⿰金⿱幺夊 is elected as 崇禎丙子科（1636）舉人 and he is a descendent of 魯荒王朱檀.

According to 《皇明祖訓》：「凡東宮、親王位下、各擬名二十字。日後生子及孫，即以上聞，付宗人府。所立雙名，每一世取一字以為上字；其下一字，臨時隨意選擇，以為雙名，編入玉牒……魯王位下：肇泰陽當健、觀頤壽以弘」, given that his last name is of the 金 radical and he was active in 17th century, his generation name should have been 壽, and therefore his full name should have been 朱壽⿰金⿱幺夊, instead of 朱慶⿰金⿱幺夊.

An IRG expert YUAN Zhiyu has generously provided me a copy of an half folio from a 雍正 era copy of《崇禎丙子科山東鄉試齒錄》, one of the Peking University rare books collection, which indeed gives his name as 朱壽⿰金⿱幺犮 (犮 + VS19).


▲ 《崇禎丙子科山東鄉試錄》（影抄北京大學藏雍正抄本）

Because this evidence predates 《［雍正］山東通志》 and sourced from a Ming dynasty document 《崇禎丙子科山東鄉試錄》, it should be more authoritative than the original evidence. It also makes much more sense than ⿰金⿱幺夊 because both ⿰金⿱幺友 and ⿰金⿱幺犮 are also attested in contemporary dictionaries:

Here is a list of ⿰金⿱幺友 in a loose chronological order.


▲ 《泰和五音新改併類聚四聲篇》（金崇慶荊國器刊元修補本）卷2 folio 4a (⿰金⿱⿰𠂈丶友、七𭭕切, this character is from 《搜真玉鏡》)


▲ 《泰和五音新改併類聚四聲篇》（元張仁刊本）卷2 folio 4a


▲ 《成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇》（明成化丁亥(三年)至庚寅(七年)金臺大隆福寺集貲刊本，故善012372-012376，國立故宮博物院）卷2 folio 4b (Note that from this version, the fanqie is modified from 七歡切 to 七勸切)


▲ 《新校經史海篇直音》（明萬曆刊本）卷1 folio 4a (Note that 音茜 is very likely to be derived from the fanqie 七勸切 in 《成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇》)


▲ 《刻太古遺踪海篇集韻大全》（明萬曆17年刊本）卷23 folio 4a


▲ 《重校全補海篇直音》（明萬曆23年刊本）卷1 folio 5a


▲ 《重校古本五音類聚四声切韻直音海篇大全》（明萬曆30年刊本）卷1 folio 5b


▲ 《翰林重攷字義韻律大板海篇》（明刊本）卷15 folio 16b

Here is a list of ⿰金⿱幺友 in a loose chronological order.


▲ 《翰林筆削字義韻律鰲頭海篇心鏡》（明萬曆10年序刊本）卷15 folio 16b


▲ 《翰林重攷字義韻律大板海篇心鏡》（明萬曆24年刊本）卷15 folio 18a


▲ 《遵古本正韻石齋海篇》（明崇禎刊本）卷14 folio 18a (a.k.a 新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉)


▲ 《精刻海若湯先生校訂音釋五侯鯖字海》（明末刊本）卷1 folio 4b

Given that the ⿰金⿱幺友 evidences predates the ⿰金⿱幺犮 + VS19 ones, and there is only one stroke difference between ⿰金⿱幺夊 and ⿰金⿱幺友, I suggest we encode the ⿰金⿱幺友 shape with both ⿰金⿱幺夊 and ⿰金⿱幺犮 + VS19 being unifiable variant of ⿰金⿱幺友.

⿰金⿱幺友

SC=7, FS=5, TS=15

Thank you Huang Junliang for the detailed investigation of this character! Based on the new evidence we agree to change the glyph and IDS to ⿰金⿱幺友.

Having only one isolated evidence is not easy to refute the irrationality of the former two pieces of evidence.