Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #61 2023-10-16 (Mon) 12:36 pm -0400 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 02345, change IDS to ⿰犭⿱大刀 |
5.0 | For 02345, change First Stroke to 1 |
5.0 | For 02345, add Discussion Record "FS=1, IDS=⿰犭⿱大刀, 2023-04." |
6.0 | For 02345, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 61." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
SAT-06646 | 1.0 |
group | SAT |
a) Source reference | SAT-06646 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | F1B1 |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 094.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 5 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 3 |
g) Total Stroke Sount | 8 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰犭夯 |
j) Similar/ Variants | Similar: 𠜓/ |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-06646-01.jpg;SAT-06646-02.jpg |
l) Optional info | N/A |
m1)Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
Based on the evidence.
The IDS is yet to be updated to ⿰犭⿱大刀.
Potentially unifiable to 𠜓 (U+20713).
According to the evidence this seems like a miswritten form of 𠜓 (U+20713). Some books give "guwen" in the structure ⿰犭⿱火刀. If SAT has other sources that use ⿰犭⿱火刀, I would encourage encoding that, instead of this one.
Agree unify to 𠜓 (U+20713).
According to 汗簡, the correct form should be ⿰[犭]⿱[火][刀], the phonetic symbol should be {*LEK (狄)}.
According to UCV #305 ⿱ ~ ⿸, ⿸[狄][刀] ~ ⿱[狄][刀] = [𠜓].