I am just curious about if the character does appear in ancient literatures. The 冫 part on the right side seems to be a little bit strange anyway. Maybe I need to broaden my horizons haha.

6

According to the analysis in the dictionary, 冫 is a mark indicating that this character is to be read differently from its standard Sino-Vietnamese reading of "cặp".

The component 冫 looks more like the Vietnamese reading mark, but there is only once case.

This comment is from individual expert Ma Shijie：

冫 is variant of lightning? It is best to refer to the handling method of lightning. Or U+16FF1 𖿱?

Multiple Sources ( 多 源 證 據 ): Supply character use evidence from multiple independence sources. IRG has the right to reject characters with evidence of use from only a single source, especially if the source is not considered authoritative by IRG.

If it is the case as comment #11739 said, I think it's OK to encode it.

This also appears in the Khó Chữ Hán Nôm Mã Hoá, the last published document with the status of a national standard.



As noted in the first evidence above, this is composed with a "nháy" reading mark. The problem is that Unicode does not allow variation of marks, so there is no way to encode this separate from another character VN-F0074 using IVS

Is it possible to encode another reading mark in case more such situations being discovered later?